Identification versus counting protocols as sources of uncertainty in diatom-based ecological status assessments

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12310%2F12%3A43883717" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12310/12:43883717 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/67985939:_____/12:00385204

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1115-z" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1115-z</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1115-z" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10750-012-1115-z</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Identification versus counting protocols as sources of uncertainty in diatom-based ecological status assessments

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In 2009, seventeen analysts participated in a pan-European diatom ring-test (intercalibration), analyzing nine samples from seven countries following the European standard EN 14407. The objective of this exercise was to agree on practical conventions ondiatom identification to facilitate future intercalibration work and to assess the extent to which national differences in sample analysis (counting protocol and identification conventions) contribute to variability in EU-level comparisons of diatom-based methods. Differences in the reported taxa lists were large, but not a major source of variation in values of a common metric (the phytobenthos Intercalibration Common Metric, ICM). Therefore, every country can apply its own identification conventions for national assessments, and still be fairly confident that the ICM reflects the national classification of its streams. Part of the index variation was due to differences in counting protocols and care should be taken when handling broke

Název v anglickém jazyce

Identification versus counting protocols as sources of uncertainty in diatom-based ecological status assessments

Popis výsledku anglicky

In 2009, seventeen analysts participated in a pan-European diatom ring-test (intercalibration), analyzing nine samples from seven countries following the European standard EN 14407. The objective of this exercise was to agree on practical conventions ondiatom identification to facilitate future intercalibration work and to assess the extent to which national differences in sample analysis (counting protocol and identification conventions) contribute to variability in EU-level comparisons of diatom-based methods. Differences in the reported taxa lists were large, but not a major source of variation in values of a common metric (the phytobenthos Intercalibration Common Metric, ICM). Therefore, every country can apply its own identification conventions for national assessments, and still be fairly confident that the ICM reflects the national classification of its streams. Part of the index variation was due to differences in counting protocols and care should be taken when handling broke

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

EF - Botanika

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Hydrobiologia

ISSN

0018-8158

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

695

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

109-124

Kód UT WoS článku

000307310000010

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—