Optimization of intervention levels in ecological restoration

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12310%2F14%3A43887742" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12310/14:43887742 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/67985939:_____/14:00432915

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/avsc.12082/pdf" target="_blank" >http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/avsc.12082/pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12082" target="_blank" >10.1111/avsc.12082</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Optimization of intervention levels in ecological restoration

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Question Are optimal intervention levels in ecological restoration linked to disturbance severity or spatial and temporal scales of restoration activities in the studies included in this special feature? Methods Comparison of ten studies of restoration in the context of disturbance severity, regional biodiversity, and predictability of succession trajectories. Results The ten studies largely represent restoration of grasslands in Europe but also include restoration following disturbances by mining, invasive species, and trampling by tourists. Maximal intervention levels were used in studies with high or low disturbance severity, low regional biodiversity, and high predictability of successional trajectories. The spatial and temporal scales of restoration activities had little effect on intervention levels. Conclusions General guidelines on how to optimize intervention levels in restoration activities can be sought by comparing success rates across gradients of disturbance severity.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Optimization of intervention levels in ecological restoration

Popis výsledku anglicky

Question Are optimal intervention levels in ecological restoration linked to disturbance severity or spatial and temporal scales of restoration activities in the studies included in this special feature? Methods Comparison of ten studies of restoration in the context of disturbance severity, regional biodiversity, and predictability of succession trajectories. Results The ten studies largely represent restoration of grasslands in Europe but also include restoration following disturbances by mining, invasive species, and trampling by tourists. Maximal intervention levels were used in studies with high or low disturbance severity, low regional biodiversity, and high predictability of successional trajectories. The spatial and temporal scales of restoration activities had little effect on intervention levels. Conclusions General guidelines on how to optimize intervention levels in restoration activities can be sought by comparing success rates across gradients of disturbance severity.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

EH - Ekologie – společenstva

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GAP505%2F11%2F0256" target="_blank" >GAP505/11/0256: Sukcese vegetace na širokých škálách prostředí - meta-analýzy dat s využitím v teorii i praxi</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Applied Vegetation Science

ISSN

1402-2001

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

17

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

187-192

Kód UT WoS článku

000332774800001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—