Methods for obtaining more complete species lists in surveys of lichen biodiversity
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12310%2F16%3A43890781" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12310/16:43890781 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11310/16:10331273
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/njb.01053/abstract" target="_blank" >http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/njb.01053/abstract</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/njb.01053" target="_blank" >10.1111/njb.01053</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Methods for obtaining more complete species lists in surveys of lichen biodiversity
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
We tested two methods to obtain more complete species inventories in surveys of lichen biodiversity. The first was to employ eight lichenologists (all experienced, some specialists) acting as individuals in parallel in a competitive survey. The second was to organize those lichenologists into two competing teams. We show that overall recorded biodiversity is distinctly higher than the part of lichen biodiversity recorded by each single lichenologist (45-66%) or team (79-83%). Use of these methods in a survey of epiphytic and epixylic lichens resulted in a list containing 112 species in 1 ha, 192 species in 12.5 ha and 212 species for 30 km(2) of lowland floodplain old-growth forest in southeastern Czech Republic. Eleven recorded species are new to the country; four are rediscovered after more than 50 years. In comparison, few previous surveys of mixed montane forests in the same region have yielded more than 200 species, even though it is certain that those forests have greater lichen diversity than our lowland forest.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Methods for obtaining more complete species lists in surveys of lichen biodiversity
Popis výsledku anglicky
We tested two methods to obtain more complete species inventories in surveys of lichen biodiversity. The first was to employ eight lichenologists (all experienced, some specialists) acting as individuals in parallel in a competitive survey. The second was to organize those lichenologists into two competing teams. We show that overall recorded biodiversity is distinctly higher than the part of lichen biodiversity recorded by each single lichenologist (45-66%) or team (79-83%). Use of these methods in a survey of epiphytic and epixylic lichens resulted in a list containing 112 species in 1 ha, 192 species in 12.5 ha and 212 species for 30 km(2) of lowland floodplain old-growth forest in southeastern Czech Republic. Eleven recorded species are new to the country; four are rediscovered after more than 50 years. In comparison, few previous surveys of mixed montane forests in the same region have yielded more than 200 species, even though it is certain that those forests have greater lichen diversity than our lowland forest.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
EF - Botanika
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Nordic Journal of Botany
ISSN
0107-055X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
34
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
5
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
619-626
Kód UT WoS článku
000385564800016
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—