Evaluation of extraction methods for quantitative analysis of tardigrade populations in soil and leaf litter

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12310%2F18%3A43897466" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12310/18:43897466 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/60077344:_____/18:00493770 RIV/67985823:_____/18:00493770 RIV/44555601:13440/18:43893819

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0031405618300064?token=3C46DD8B6076F37EC9639D6B58ABB90B79CD48BC2FFD201B0C27A3C69E2FB079998BE9199CAC4B61311721DDE1D0A740" target="_blank" >https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0031405618300064?token=3C46DD8B6076F37EC9639D6B58ABB90B79CD48BC2FFD201B0C27A3C69E2FB079998BE9199CAC4B61311721DDE1D0A740</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2018.06.005" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.pedobi.2018.06.005</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Evaluation of extraction methods for quantitative analysis of tardigrade populations in soil and leaf litter

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Accurate quantitative analysis of soil tardigrades depends on a relevant extraction method. Over the years, a number of different methods have been used, but the efficiency of these methods has rarely been evaluated for soil and leaf litter tardigrades. Four methods of extraction were compared in this study: the light-cooling (L-C) extractor, the high-gradient (H-G), Baermann extractor, the non-gradient (N-G) Baermann extractor and sieves. The results indicate that light and temperature are significant factors influencing tardigrade extraction. The L-C and H-G extractors were more effective than sieves for all substrate categories. These extraction methods (L-C and H-G) therefore seem to be appropriate for quantitative studies of soil and leaf litter tardigrades.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Evaluation of extraction methods for quantitative analysis of tardigrade populations in soil and leaf litter

Popis výsledku anglicky

Accurate quantitative analysis of soil tardigrades depends on a relevant extraction method. Over the years, a number of different methods have been used, but the efficiency of these methods has rarely been evaluated for soil and leaf litter tardigrades. Four methods of extraction were compared in this study: the light-cooling (L-C) extractor, the high-gradient (H-G), Baermann extractor, the non-gradient (N-G) Baermann extractor and sieves. The results indicate that light and temperature are significant factors influencing tardigrade extraction. The L-C and H-G extractors were more effective than sieves for all substrate categories. These extraction methods (L-C and H-G) therefore seem to be appropriate for quantitative studies of soil and leaf litter tardigrades.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10618 - Ecology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GAP207%2F12%2F0919" target="_blank" >GAP207/12/0919: Úloha hydrofobní zóny plasmatické membrány v regulaci funkční aktivity trimerních G proteinů receptorem pro opioidy typu delta</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Pedobiologia

ISSN

0031-4056

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

70

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

SEP 2018

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

1-5

Kód UT WoS článku

000444447700001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85050119671