Appropriate aspirations for effective post-mining restoration and rehabilitation: a response to Kazmierczak et al.

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12310%2F18%3A43897763" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12310/18:43897763 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/67985939:_____/18:00494857

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs12665-018-7437-z.pdf" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs12665-018-7437-z.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7437-z" target="_blank" >10.1007/s12665-018-7437-z</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Appropriate aspirations for effective post-mining restoration and rehabilitation: a response to Kazmierczak et al.

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Confusion surrounding the definition and application of terminology in post-mining ecological repair has resulted in uncertainty for industry, the scientific community and regulators. This lack of clarity may underrepresent high aspirations or could be misused to disguise low aspirations and so is problematic for setting objectives, establishing goals and assessing recovery trajectories. We respond to a recently published analysis of the ecosystem repair literature, where we highlight inconsistencies stemming from inadequate reference to a large proportion of the restoration and rehabilitation literature. We outline increasingly well-accepted and internationally applied definitions concerning the restoration and recovery process and invite both the mining industry and policy-makers to re-examine their terminology in the interests of attaining an internationally agreed nomenclature. Clarity in the use and understanding of terminology will align post-mining targets with community expectation, enhance the capacity of the mining industry to understand and meet these targets, and foster better analysis and more industry-relevant discussion of recovery methodologies by the scientific community and practitioners.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Appropriate aspirations for effective post-mining restoration and rehabilitation: a response to Kazmierczak et al.

Popis výsledku anglicky

Confusion surrounding the definition and application of terminology in post-mining ecological repair has resulted in uncertainty for industry, the scientific community and regulators. This lack of clarity may underrepresent high aspirations or could be misused to disguise low aspirations and so is problematic for setting objectives, establishing goals and assessing recovery trajectories. We respond to a recently published analysis of the ecosystem repair literature, where we highlight inconsistencies stemming from inadequate reference to a large proportion of the restoration and rehabilitation literature. We outline increasingly well-accepted and internationally applied definitions concerning the restoration and recovery process and invite both the mining industry and policy-makers to re-examine their terminology in the interests of attaining an internationally agreed nomenclature. Clarity in the use and understanding of terminology will align post-mining targets with community expectation, enhance the capacity of the mining industry to understand and meet these targets, and foster better analysis and more industry-relevant discussion of recovery methodologies by the scientific community and practitioners.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10618 - Ecology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA17-09979S" target="_blank" >GA17-09979S: Faktory determinující sukcesi vegetace v měřítku České republiky</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Environmental Earth Sciences

ISSN

1866-6280

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

77

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

6

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

000428780300041

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85044447999