Spontaneous revegetation versus forestry reclamation-Vegetation development in coal mining spoil heaps across Central Europe
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12310%2F19%3A43899129" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12310/19:43899129 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/67985939:_____/19:00505218
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ldr.3233" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ldr.3233</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3233" target="_blank" >10.1002/ldr.3233</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Spontaneous revegetation versus forestry reclamation-Vegetation development in coal mining spoil heaps across Central Europe
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Comparison of spontaneous revegetation and forestry reclamation can provide valuable information about the trajectories and rate of vegetation development applicable to restoration practice over broader geographical scales. In the current study, we sampled terrestrial vegetation in spontaneously revegetated and forestry reclaimed spoil heaps after brown coal mining differing in age in three regions across Central Europe (Germany, the Czech Republic, and Hungary). The main objective was to compare the course of vegetation development and species richness between the two restoration methods over a large geographical scale. In all geographical regions, species richness was higher on spontaneously revegetated sites. Although the starting point differed across regions, trajectories to woodland development converged with time. In addition, spontaneous revegetation was comparably as fast as forestry reclamation in developing towards woodland. Spontaneous revegetation proved to be more valuable and cost-effective in terms of nature conservation and should be considered as an alternative restoration strategy to forestry reclamation in Central Europe.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Spontaneous revegetation versus forestry reclamation-Vegetation development in coal mining spoil heaps across Central Europe
Popis výsledku anglicky
Comparison of spontaneous revegetation and forestry reclamation can provide valuable information about the trajectories and rate of vegetation development applicable to restoration practice over broader geographical scales. In the current study, we sampled terrestrial vegetation in spontaneously revegetated and forestry reclaimed spoil heaps after brown coal mining differing in age in three regions across Central Europe (Germany, the Czech Republic, and Hungary). The main objective was to compare the course of vegetation development and species richness between the two restoration methods over a large geographical scale. In all geographical regions, species richness was higher on spontaneously revegetated sites. Although the starting point differed across regions, trajectories to woodland development converged with time. In addition, spontaneous revegetation was comparably as fast as forestry reclamation in developing towards woodland. Spontaneous revegetation proved to be more valuable and cost-effective in terms of nature conservation and should be considered as an alternative restoration strategy to forestry reclamation in Central Europe.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA17-09979S" target="_blank" >GA17-09979S: Faktory determinující sukcesi vegetace v měřítku České republiky</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Land Degradation and Development
ISSN
1085-3278
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
30
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
9
Strana od-do
348-356
Kód UT WoS článku
000457471200010
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85058271632