Response of clonal versus non-clonal herbs to disturbance: Different strategies revealed

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12310%2F20%3A43901081" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12310/20:43901081 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/67985939:_____/20:00532156 RIV/00216208:11310/20:10424246

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1433831920300202?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1433831920300202?via%3Dihub</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2020.125529" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ppees.2020.125529</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Response of clonal versus non-clonal herbs to disturbance: Different strategies revealed

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Disturbance is an omnipresent selective factor that shapes plant strategies. While annual species that rely on rapid generative reproduction dominate in habitats frequently affected by severe disturbance, long-lived woody species occupy habitats where the effects of disturbance are weak. These are, however, the extremes in the disturbance gradient. Habitats under intermediate disturbance are occupied by the whole spectrum of plant strategies. In this study, we hypothesized that clonal herbs are better adapted to intermediate disturbance than non-clonal herbs because the characteristics of their bud bank and related belowground carbohydrate storage promote vegetative regeneration. In a greenhouse experiment, we tested the effects of disturbance on the survival and performance of 17 congeneric pairs of clonal and non-clonal herbs cultivated from seed. In addition to a non-disturbed control, we applied five disturbance treatments: biomass removal 2 cm above the soil surface, removal of 70 % of the aboveground biomass, late spring frost, flooding, and belowground injury. Mortality was negligible except the flooding treatment, where it was higher for non-clonal than for clonal plants. Total biomass was reduced more by the disturbance treatments for clonal than for non-clonal plants, suggesting that clonal species suffer more than non-clonal species. On the other hand, clonal plants had significantly greater total belowground biomass and R:S ratios than non-clonal plants, suggesting a strong investment in belowground organs by clonal plants. In response to disturbance, the SLA and SRL values increased in clonal plants but decreased in non-clonal plants, indicating that clonal and non-clonal plants differ in how they cope with disturbance. Although clonality is considered to be an adaptation to disturbance, our results indicate that, during the first year of life, clonal herbs are more sensitive to disturbance than non-clonal herbs, likely due to preferential investment in belowground biomass.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Response of clonal versus non-clonal herbs to disturbance: Different strategies revealed

Popis výsledku anglicky

Disturbance is an omnipresent selective factor that shapes plant strategies. While annual species that rely on rapid generative reproduction dominate in habitats frequently affected by severe disturbance, long-lived woody species occupy habitats where the effects of disturbance are weak. These are, however, the extremes in the disturbance gradient. Habitats under intermediate disturbance are occupied by the whole spectrum of plant strategies. In this study, we hypothesized that clonal herbs are better adapted to intermediate disturbance than non-clonal herbs because the characteristics of their bud bank and related belowground carbohydrate storage promote vegetative regeneration. In a greenhouse experiment, we tested the effects of disturbance on the survival and performance of 17 congeneric pairs of clonal and non-clonal herbs cultivated from seed. In addition to a non-disturbed control, we applied five disturbance treatments: biomass removal 2 cm above the soil surface, removal of 70 % of the aboveground biomass, late spring frost, flooding, and belowground injury. Mortality was negligible except the flooding treatment, where it was higher for non-clonal than for clonal plants. Total biomass was reduced more by the disturbance treatments for clonal than for non-clonal plants, suggesting that clonal species suffer more than non-clonal species. On the other hand, clonal plants had significantly greater total belowground biomass and R:S ratios than non-clonal plants, suggesting a strong investment in belowground organs by clonal plants. In response to disturbance, the SLA and SRL values increased in clonal plants but decreased in non-clonal plants, indicating that clonal and non-clonal plants differ in how they cope with disturbance. Although clonality is considered to be an adaptation to disturbance, our results indicate that, during the first year of life, clonal herbs are more sensitive to disturbance than non-clonal herbs, likely due to preferential investment in belowground biomass.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10618 - Ecology

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics

ISSN

1433-8319

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

44

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

JUN 2020

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

000555546700002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85085565480