Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Relationship between dominance hierarchy steepness and rank-relatedness of benefits in primates

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12310%2F24%3A43908820" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12310/24:43908820 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article/35/5/arae066/7732141?login=true" target="_blank" >https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article/35/5/arae066/7732141?login=true</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arae066" target="_blank" >10.1093/beheco/arae066</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Relationship between dominance hierarchy steepness and rank-relatedness of benefits in primates

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    In animal social groups, the extent to which individuals consistently win agonistic interactions and their ability to monopolize resources represent 2 core aspects of their competitive regime. However, whether these two aspects are closely correlated within groups has rarely been studied. Here, we tested the hypothesis that hierarchy steepness, which is generally used to represent power differentials between group members, predicts the variation in the distribution of fitness-related benefits (i.e. fecundity, infant survival, mating success, and feeding success) in relation to individual dominance ranks. We tested this hypothesis in primate groups using comparative phylogenetic meta-analytical techniques. Specifically, we reviewed published and unpublished studies to extract data on individual dominance ranks, their access to fitness-related benefits, and hierarchy steepness. We collected and included in our analysis a total of 153 data points, representing 27 species (including 2 chimpanzee sub-species). From these, we used 4 common methods to measure individual dominance ranks and hierarchy steepness, i.e. Dij-based normalized David&apos;s scores, randomized Elo-ratings, and David&apos;s scores and Elo-ratings estimated in Bayesian frameworks. We found that hierarchy steepness had no effect on the strength of the relationship between dominance rank and access to fitness-related benefits. Our results suggest that hierarchy steepness does not reflect between-group variation in the extent to which individual dominance affects the acquisition of fitness-related benefits in primates. Although the ability to win agonistic encounters is essential, we speculate that other behavioral strategies adopted by individuals may play crucial roles in resource acquisition in animal competitive regimes. In social animals, group members compete to attain dominant positions. Dominant individuals are expected to have better access to key resources, like food or mating. In our study, we show that the strength of the dominance hierarchy does not affect the distribution of key resources in primates. The distribution of social bonds and agonistic support between group members may weaken the effect of dominance hierarchy on how key resources are accessed by dominants and subordinates.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Relationship between dominance hierarchy steepness and rank-relatedness of benefits in primates

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    In animal social groups, the extent to which individuals consistently win agonistic interactions and their ability to monopolize resources represent 2 core aspects of their competitive regime. However, whether these two aspects are closely correlated within groups has rarely been studied. Here, we tested the hypothesis that hierarchy steepness, which is generally used to represent power differentials between group members, predicts the variation in the distribution of fitness-related benefits (i.e. fecundity, infant survival, mating success, and feeding success) in relation to individual dominance ranks. We tested this hypothesis in primate groups using comparative phylogenetic meta-analytical techniques. Specifically, we reviewed published and unpublished studies to extract data on individual dominance ranks, their access to fitness-related benefits, and hierarchy steepness. We collected and included in our analysis a total of 153 data points, representing 27 species (including 2 chimpanzee sub-species). From these, we used 4 common methods to measure individual dominance ranks and hierarchy steepness, i.e. Dij-based normalized David&apos;s scores, randomized Elo-ratings, and David&apos;s scores and Elo-ratings estimated in Bayesian frameworks. We found that hierarchy steepness had no effect on the strength of the relationship between dominance rank and access to fitness-related benefits. Our results suggest that hierarchy steepness does not reflect between-group variation in the extent to which individual dominance affects the acquisition of fitness-related benefits in primates. Although the ability to win agonistic encounters is essential, we speculate that other behavioral strategies adopted by individuals may play crucial roles in resource acquisition in animal competitive regimes. In social animals, group members compete to attain dominant positions. Dominant individuals are expected to have better access to key resources, like food or mating. In our study, we show that the strength of the dominance hierarchy does not affect the distribution of key resources in primates. The distribution of social bonds and agonistic support between group members may weaken the effect of dominance hierarchy on how key resources are accessed by dominants and subordinates.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    10614 - Behavioral sciences biology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2024

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Behavioral Ecology

  • ISSN

    1045-2249

  • e-ISSN

    1465-7279

  • Svazek periodika

    35

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    5

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

  • Počet stran výsledku

    14

  • Strana od-do

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001297773600001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85202684570