Comparison of results of spiroergometry on running and bicycle ergometer of athletes with running and cycling specialization

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12410%2F20%3A43901831" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12410/20:43901831 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://munispace.muni.cz/library/catalog/chapter/1711/216" target="_blank" >https://munispace.muni.cz/library/catalog/chapter/1711/216</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-9631-2020-17" target="_blank" >10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-9631-2020-17</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of results of spiroergometry on running and bicycle ergometer of athletes with running and cycling specialization

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Purpose: A choice between a running or bicycle ergometer is not possible in every laboratory. Significant differences may appear in measuring results of ergometers with different load specificity. The objective of our paper is to determine a difference in values measured during a spiroergometry test on a bicycle ergometer and a running ergometer in adolescent endurance sportsmen, with different specializations, for mountain cyclists and middle-and long-distance runners. Methods: The experiment involved 10 cyclists and 10 runners at the national top level. The cyclists and runners were divided in two groups: one half of the tested group completed the first test on a running ergometer and the other on a bicycle ergometer. The test on the other ergometer was taken after three days&apos; time. The progressed load test up to &quot;vita maxima&quot; was used for both ergometers. The examined parameters included values VO 2 max, V T , VE, BF, HR max and WR max. Results were evaluated in terms of both statistical and substantial significance. Statistical significance was ascertained by means of t-test at the level α=0.05. Cohen&apos;s d was used to evaluate substantial significance. Results: The results showed substantially significant differences for runners in all examined parameters. A substantially significant difference in measurement results of cyclists was discovered for parameters VO2 max, VT , VE and WR max. In runners, the mean of values for the most important parameter VO2 max reached 60.6 ± 4.24 ml.min-1.kg-1 when running, and 56.0 ± 5.34 ml.min-1.kg-1 when cycling; values reached by cyclists were 56.6 ± 5.16 ml.min-1.kg-1 when running, and 61.30 ± 4.47 ml.min-1.kg-1 when cycling. The only parameter not to correspond with the sportsmen&apos;s specializations was V T , as it revealed larger values on a bicycle also for runners. Conclusion: Results confirmed the correspondence between the load specificity according to the ergometer selected and the specificity of sports pursued. It was proven that it is necessary to select a suitable type of appliance for determining VO2 max according to the sports pursued.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of results of spiroergometry on running and bicycle ergometer of athletes with running and cycling specialization

Popis výsledku anglicky

Purpose: A choice between a running or bicycle ergometer is not possible in every laboratory. Significant differences may appear in measuring results of ergometers with different load specificity. The objective of our paper is to determine a difference in values measured during a spiroergometry test on a bicycle ergometer and a running ergometer in adolescent endurance sportsmen, with different specializations, for mountain cyclists and middle-and long-distance runners. Methods: The experiment involved 10 cyclists and 10 runners at the national top level. The cyclists and runners were divided in two groups: one half of the tested group completed the first test on a running ergometer and the other on a bicycle ergometer. The test on the other ergometer was taken after three days&apos; time. The progressed load test up to &quot;vita maxima&quot; was used for both ergometers. The examined parameters included values VO 2 max, V T , VE, BF, HR max and WR max. Results were evaluated in terms of both statistical and substantial significance. Statistical significance was ascertained by means of t-test at the level α=0.05. Cohen&apos;s d was used to evaluate substantial significance. Results: The results showed substantially significant differences for runners in all examined parameters. A substantially significant difference in measurement results of cyclists was discovered for parameters VO2 max, VT , VE and WR max. In runners, the mean of values for the most important parameter VO2 max reached 60.6 ± 4.24 ml.min-1.kg-1 when running, and 56.0 ± 5.34 ml.min-1.kg-1 when cycling; values reached by cyclists were 56.6 ± 5.16 ml.min-1.kg-1 when running, and 61.30 ± 4.47 ml.min-1.kg-1 when cycling. The only parameter not to correspond with the sportsmen&apos;s specializations was V T , as it revealed larger values on a bicycle also for runners. Conclusion: Results confirmed the correspondence between the load specificity according to the ergometer selected and the specificity of sports pursued. It was proven that it is necessary to select a suitable type of appliance for determining VO2 max according to the sports pursued.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30306 - Sport and fitness sciences

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Kinanthropology, Sport and Quality of Life 7.–9. 11. 2019

ISBN

978-80-210-9631-8

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

140-146

Název nakladatele

Masarykova univerzita v Brně, Fakulta sportovních studií

Místo vydání

Brno

Místo konání akce

Brno

Datum konání akce

7. 11. 2019

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000618047200017