Controversial approach to wolf management in the Czech Republic
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12510%2F21%3A43902495" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12510/21:43902495 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.agriculturejournals.cz/web/agricecon.htm?type=article&id=377_2020-AGRICECON" target="_blank" >https://www.agriculturejournals.cz/web/agricecon.htm?type=article&id=377_2020-AGRICECON</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/377/2020-AGRICECON" target="_blank" >10.17221/377/2020-AGRICECON</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Controversial approach to wolf management in the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Expansion of the wolf in the Czech Republic results in an increasing conflict between nature conservationists and other landscape users. In March 2020, the Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic issued the "Wolf Management Programme". The document provoked negative reactions from organisations of farmers, breeders, and hunters. The article deals with the key issues triggered by the conflict and the attitudes of actors involved. We want to clarify to what extent the solutions designed by individual parties help to mitigate the conflict and how the financial demands related to this issue have been evolving. The problem may seem marginal in the Czech Republic, but the wolf population density in some regions may already be close to its bearable maximum. Key problems are the identification of specific target numbers of wolves, the absence of zoning as a future option, and clear rules for dealing with direct encounters of wolves with humans. The benefit of wolf management is primarily the sum of preventive measures it aims to address, but the relationship with other main actors and the area of education and promotion is debatable as it represents a further increase in the absorption of public funds without guarantees of effectiveness.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Controversial approach to wolf management in the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku anglicky
Expansion of the wolf in the Czech Republic results in an increasing conflict between nature conservationists and other landscape users. In March 2020, the Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic issued the "Wolf Management Programme". The document provoked negative reactions from organisations of farmers, breeders, and hunters. The article deals with the key issues triggered by the conflict and the attitudes of actors involved. We want to clarify to what extent the solutions designed by individual parties help to mitigate the conflict and how the financial demands related to this issue have been evolving. The problem may seem marginal in the Czech Republic, but the wolf population density in some regions may already be close to its bearable maximum. Key problems are the identification of specific target numbers of wolves, the absence of zoning as a future option, and clear rules for dealing with direct encounters of wolves with humans. The benefit of wolf management is primarily the sum of preventive measures it aims to address, but the relationship with other main actors and the area of education and promotion is debatable as it represents a further increase in the absorption of public funds without guarantees of effectiveness.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50204 - Business and management
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Agricultural Economics : Zemědělská ekonomika
ISSN
0139-570X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
67
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
1-10
Kód UT WoS článku
000614438200001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85100659921