Sampling for ants in different-aged spruce forests: A comparison of methods

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60077344%3A_____%2F09%3A00329617" target="_blank" >RIV/60077344:_____/09:00329617 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00020702:_____/09:0R000403

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Sampling for ants in different-aged spruce forests: A comparison of methods

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

It is necessary to use special sampling method for studying of each animal group. However each method has its specificity and describes the studied community a bit differently. Three common methods for sampling of ants were compared: soil excavation, pitfall traps and baits. Ants were sampled in 25 patches in a large spruce forest in the Czech Republic during 2005 and 2006. Each patch represented one of five age classes (0-2, 3-5, 8-12, 26-41 and 85-105 years old), and the patches were located in five sites such that the five patches in each site formed a chronosequence. The percentage of variability in ants as explained by other sampling techniques was as follows: 60.0% of the variability in bait data was explained by pitfall trap data, while only 19.7% of the variability in pitfall trap data was explained by excavation data.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Sampling for ants in different-aged spruce forests: A comparison of methods

Popis výsledku anglicky

It is necessary to use special sampling method for studying of each animal group. However each method has its specificity and describes the studied community a bit differently. Three common methods for sampling of ants were compared: soil excavation, pitfall traps and baits. Ants were sampled in 25 patches in a large spruce forest in the Czech Republic during 2005 and 2006. Each patch represented one of five age classes (0-2, 3-5, 8-12, 26-41 and 85-105 years old), and the patches were located in five sites such that the five patches in each site formed a chronosequence. The percentage of variability in ants as explained by other sampling techniques was as follows: 60.0% of the variability in bait data was explained by pitfall trap data, while only 19.7% of the variability in pitfall trap data was explained by excavation data.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

EH - Ekologie – společenstva

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2009

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Journal of Soil Biology

ISSN

1164-5563

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

45

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

FR - Francouzská republika

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

000268372700003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—