Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Optimal gillnet sampling design for the estimation of fish community indicators in heterogeneous freshwater ecosystems

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60077344%3A_____%2F17%3A00479477" target="_blank" >RIV/60077344:_____/17:00479477 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/60076658:12310/17:43895380

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.036" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.036</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.036" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.036</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Optimal gillnet sampling design for the estimation of fish community indicators in heterogeneous freshwater ecosystems

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Monitoring of biota in heterogeneous ecosystems requires sampling in different habitats and across environmental gradients. The resulting multivariate community data are typically aggregated into one or several indicator values for the entire ecosystem, but the relationship between the robustness of such indicators and sampling effort, including the identification of minimum acceptable sampling designs, is not fully understood. nWe address this issue for multi-mesh gillnet sampling of freshwater fish communities in deep-valley reservoirs, using data from 29 detailed annual surveys in eight reservoirs in the Czech Republic that account for the inherent longitudinal and depth gradients and the qualitatively different benthic and pelagic habitats. We evaluate the performance of eight sampling scenarios, created by variously reducing the full dataset. To this end, we use 31 fish-based, community-, size- and species-level indicators calculated separately for benthic and pelagic habitats, and fit the relationships between the indicator values based on the reduced and full sampling design using Bayesian generalized linear models. nThe ability of reduced data to estimate the true indicator value across the entire dataset, expressed as the adjusted R-2 value of the best model for the given indicator, increased with sampling effort. However, the relationships differed between indicators: R-2 values were higher for abundance-based than for biomass-based indicators. We identified three suitable reduced sampling designs: (1) sampling the entire longitudinal profile in the epilimnion, (2) same as before but limited to one sampling layer closest to the surface, and (3) sampling all depth strata at the farthest points of the longitudinal gradient (i.e., dam and tributary). These results demonstrate that, in order to obtain robust estimates of fish community indicators, current gillnet sampling protocols can be optimized to reduce effort and minimize unwanted fish mortality.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Optimal gillnet sampling design for the estimation of fish community indicators in heterogeneous freshwater ecosystems

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Monitoring of biota in heterogeneous ecosystems requires sampling in different habitats and across environmental gradients. The resulting multivariate community data are typically aggregated into one or several indicator values for the entire ecosystem, but the relationship between the robustness of such indicators and sampling effort, including the identification of minimum acceptable sampling designs, is not fully understood. nWe address this issue for multi-mesh gillnet sampling of freshwater fish communities in deep-valley reservoirs, using data from 29 detailed annual surveys in eight reservoirs in the Czech Republic that account for the inherent longitudinal and depth gradients and the qualitatively different benthic and pelagic habitats. We evaluate the performance of eight sampling scenarios, created by variously reducing the full dataset. To this end, we use 31 fish-based, community-, size- and species-level indicators calculated separately for benthic and pelagic habitats, and fit the relationships between the indicator values based on the reduced and full sampling design using Bayesian generalized linear models. nThe ability of reduced data to estimate the true indicator value across the entire dataset, expressed as the adjusted R-2 value of the best model for the given indicator, increased with sampling effort. However, the relationships differed between indicators: R-2 values were higher for abundance-based than for biomass-based indicators. We identified three suitable reduced sampling designs: (1) sampling the entire longitudinal profile in the epilimnion, (2) same as before but limited to one sampling layer closest to the surface, and (3) sampling all depth strata at the farthest points of the longitudinal gradient (i.e., dam and tributary). These results demonstrate that, in order to obtain robust estimates of fish community indicators, current gillnet sampling protocols can be optimized to reduce effort and minimize unwanted fish mortality.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    10617 - Marine biology, freshwater biology, limnology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2017

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Ecological Indicators

  • ISSN

    1470-160X

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    77

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    JUN

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    NL - Nizozemsko

  • Počet stran výsledku

    9

  • Strana od-do

    368-376

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000406435800038

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85014430867