Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

European fish-based assessment reveals high diversity of systems for determining ecological status of lakes.

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60077344%3A_____%2F22%3A00551524" target="_blank" >RIV/60077344:_____/22:00551524 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149620" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149620</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149620" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149620</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    European fish-based assessment reveals high diversity of systems for determining ecological status of lakes.

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Triggered by the adoption of the Water Framework Directive, a variety of fish-based systems were developed throughout Europe to assess the ecological status of lakes. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of all existing systems and summarizes sampling methods, fish community traits (metrics) and the relevant anthropogenic pressures assessed by them. Twenty-one European countries developed fish-based assessment systems. Three countries each developed two distinct systems to approach different ecoregions, either to use different data, or to assess different lake types leading to a total number of 24 systems. The most common approach for the setting of reference conditions, used in seventeen systems, was the utilisation of fish communities in comparably undisturbed natural lakes as reference. Eleven used expert judgment, nine historical data and eight modelled relationships. Fourteen systems combined at least two approaches. The most common fish sampling method was a standardized fishing procedure with multimesh-gillnets. Many countries applied combinations of fishing methods, e.g. non-standard gillnets, fyke nets and electrofishing. Altogether 177 metrics were used for index development and each system combined 2-13 metrics. The most common ones were total standardized catches of number and biomass, relative abundance of Perca fluviatilis,

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    European fish-based assessment reveals high diversity of systems for determining ecological status of lakes.

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Triggered by the adoption of the Water Framework Directive, a variety of fish-based systems were developed throughout Europe to assess the ecological status of lakes. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of all existing systems and summarizes sampling methods, fish community traits (metrics) and the relevant anthropogenic pressures assessed by them. Twenty-one European countries developed fish-based assessment systems. Three countries each developed two distinct systems to approach different ecoregions, either to use different data, or to assess different lake types leading to a total number of 24 systems. The most common approach for the setting of reference conditions, used in seventeen systems, was the utilisation of fish communities in comparably undisturbed natural lakes as reference. Eleven used expert judgment, nine historical data and eight modelled relationships. Fourteen systems combined at least two approaches. The most common fish sampling method was a standardized fishing procedure with multimesh-gillnets. Many countries applied combinations of fishing methods, e.g. non-standard gillnets, fyke nets and electrofishing. Altogether 177 metrics were used for index development and each system combined 2-13 metrics. The most common ones were total standardized catches of number and biomass, relative abundance of Perca fluviatilis,

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    10618 - Ecology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/EF16_025%2F0007417" target="_blank" >EF16_025/0007417: Biomanipulace jako nástroj zlepšení kvality vody nádrží</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2022

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Science of the Total Environment

  • ISSN

    0048-9697

  • e-ISSN

    1879-1026

  • Svazek periodika

    802

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    Jan

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    NL - Nizozemsko

  • Počet stran výsledku

    15

  • Strana od-do

    149620

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000701752500003

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85113207536