Plant and fauna biodiversity benefits from the combination of reclaimed and unreclaimed sites in heaps after uranium mining
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60077344%3A_____%2F25%3A00636175" target="_blank" >RIV/60077344:_____/25:00636175 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/60460709:41330/25:102152 RIV/44555601:13520/25:43899666 RIV/00216208:11310/25:10500187
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001016?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001016?via%3Dihub</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107613" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107613</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Plant and fauna biodiversity benefits from the combination of reclaimed and unreclaimed sites in heaps after uranium mining
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Mining significantly impacts the environment, but post-mining sites, particularly those left to natural succession, often support numerous rare species. Plant and soil fauna communities were studied using field inventories and pitfall trapping on reclaimed and unreclaimed heaps after uranium mining near Příbram (Czech Republic), and in the surrounding landscape (control site). All macrofauna invertebrates were sorted into orders, while Oniscidea, Diplopoda, Chilopoda, Araneae, Carabidae, and Formicidae were identified to the species level. Unreclaimed heaps were covered with stones, sparse shrubby and herbaceous vegetation, while reclaimed heaps were covered by 0.5 m of topsoil and planted with mixed forest. The control site consisted of forest and agricultural land. The number of plant layer species and vegetation cover at this level on unreclaimed heaps were lower compared to reclaimed ones. However, the average number of tree species was higher on unreclaimed sites, despite the average cover of tree layer was lower. A total of 24,101 individuals were caught, with 15,507 identified into 209 species. The highest number of red- listed species was found in reclaimed sites (Kusumoarto et al., 2020 (21)), followed by unreclaimed sites (Heneberg and Rezac, 2018 (14)) and the control site (Chase and Leibold, 2002 (6)). Spiders dominated the red- listed species (Luff, 1998 (24)) across all locations. Habitat preferences differed across all identified invertebrates. Reclaimed sites represent an intermediate state between unreclaimed heaps and the control site. Reclaimed and unreclaimed sites were significantly different from each other, as well as from the control site. Our study indicates that both reclaimed and unreclaimed heaps serve as important biodiversity hotspots for threatened or endangered species.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Plant and fauna biodiversity benefits from the combination of reclaimed and unreclaimed sites in heaps after uranium mining
Popis výsledku anglicky
Mining significantly impacts the environment, but post-mining sites, particularly those left to natural succession, often support numerous rare species. Plant and soil fauna communities were studied using field inventories and pitfall trapping on reclaimed and unreclaimed heaps after uranium mining near Příbram (Czech Republic), and in the surrounding landscape (control site). All macrofauna invertebrates were sorted into orders, while Oniscidea, Diplopoda, Chilopoda, Araneae, Carabidae, and Formicidae were identified to the species level. Unreclaimed heaps were covered with stones, sparse shrubby and herbaceous vegetation, while reclaimed heaps were covered by 0.5 m of topsoil and planted with mixed forest. The control site consisted of forest and agricultural land. The number of plant layer species and vegetation cover at this level on unreclaimed heaps were lower compared to reclaimed ones. However, the average number of tree species was higher on unreclaimed sites, despite the average cover of tree layer was lower. A total of 24,101 individuals were caught, with 15,507 identified into 209 species. The highest number of red- listed species was found in reclaimed sites (Kusumoarto et al., 2020 (21)), followed by unreclaimed sites (Heneberg and Rezac, 2018 (14)) and the control site (Chase and Leibold, 2002 (6)). Spiders dominated the red- listed species (Luff, 1998 (24)) across all locations. Habitat preferences differed across all identified invertebrates. Reclaimed sites represent an intermediate state between unreclaimed heaps and the control site. Reclaimed and unreclaimed sites were significantly different from each other, as well as from the control site. Our study indicates that both reclaimed and unreclaimed heaps serve as important biodiversity hotspots for threatened or endangered species.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10618 - Ecology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Ecological Engineering
ISSN
0925-8574
e-ISSN
1872-6992
Svazek periodika
215
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
May
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
9
Strana od-do
107613
Kód UT WoS článku
001450527300001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105000143872