Dry or wet? Comparing black slot trap efficiency in spruce bark beetles control

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60077344%3A_____%2F25%3A00642770" target="_blank" >RIV/60077344:_____/25:00642770 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11676-025-01959-z" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11676-025-01959-z</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11676-025-01959-z" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11676-025-01959-z</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Dry or wet? Comparing black slot trap efficiency in spruce bark beetles control

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Bark beetles are one of the greatest threats to coniferous forests in Europe. Pheromone traps are currently the most effective method of controlling the mass infestations that some of them are known to cause. However, the efficiency of pheromone traps has not yet been sufficiently researched, especially in relation to other important variables that are influenced by the current global changes. Ips typographus L. and Pityogenes chalcographus L. are two economically important bark beetle species that cause major damage to conifers in Serbia. In the present study, we evaluate the efficiency of two commonly used pheromone traps set during a three-year experiment in the Tara National Park in Serbia. During this period, 672,934 ind. of I. typographus and 2,597,578 ind. of P. chalcographus were caught. Our results show that wet traps were about 1.8 times more efficient than dry traps for both species studied. Furthermore, our results indicate that the optimal temperatures for bark beetle flight are between 22 °C and 26 °C, with substantial swarming behaviour occurring at 16.5 °C. At the same time, the data also show a negative correlation between the number of individuals caught and temperatures above 16 °C, suggesting that temperature is probably not the only key factor influencing bark beetle activity.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Dry or wet? Comparing black slot trap efficiency in spruce bark beetles control

Popis výsledku anglicky

Bark beetles are one of the greatest threats to coniferous forests in Europe. Pheromone traps are currently the most effective method of controlling the mass infestations that some of them are known to cause. However, the efficiency of pheromone traps has not yet been sufficiently researched, especially in relation to other important variables that are influenced by the current global changes. Ips typographus L. and Pityogenes chalcographus L. are two economically important bark beetle species that cause major damage to conifers in Serbia. In the present study, we evaluate the efficiency of two commonly used pheromone traps set during a three-year experiment in the Tara National Park in Serbia. During this period, 672,934 ind. of I. typographus and 2,597,578 ind. of P. chalcographus were caught. Our results show that wet traps were about 1.8 times more efficient than dry traps for both species studied. Furthermore, our results indicate that the optimal temperatures for bark beetle flight are between 22 °C and 26 °C, with substantial swarming behaviour occurring at 16.5 °C. At the same time, the data also show a negative correlation between the number of individuals caught and temperatures above 16 °C, suggesting that temperature is probably not the only key factor influencing bark beetle activity.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10616 - Entomology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Forestry Research

ISSN

1007-662X

e-ISSN

1993-0607

Svazek periodika

37

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CN - Čínská lidová republika

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

18

Kód UT WoS článku

001632579400002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105024076795