Response of aquatic invertebrate communities to different management strategies in central European fishponds
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60077344%3A_____%2F25%3A00646919" target="_blank" >RIV/60077344:_____/25:00646919 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/60076658:12310/25:43910077 RIV/60076658:12520/25:43910077
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-025-01190-x" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-025-01190-x</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-025-01190-x" target="_blank" >10.1186/s12302-025-01190-x</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Response of aquatic invertebrate communities to different management strategies in central European fishponds
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Fishponds are essential ecosystems, inhabited by many different groups of biota and having commercial and non-commercial functions. Therefore, managing fishponds can be a crucial parameter affecting all biota inhabiting a given fishpond, and macrozoobenthos and zooplankton can be the most affected communities. Thus, this study investigates the effect of traditional management with high fish density and cereal co-feeding (business as usual management, BAU) and adjusted fishpond management (NP (natural production) and NPF (natural production with supplementary feeding)) on macrozoobenthos, zooplankton, and phytoplankton dynamics. This study was carried out in four fishponds for three seasons. Our results showed that seasonal community development was affected by management type, where BAU management had different community patterns compared to NP and NPF management. In contrast, taxa richness of all communities was comparable among the management. BAU management favored smaller zooplankton species compared to the adjusted NP and NPF. Notably, macrozoobenthos and phytoplankton also showed significant differences between NP and NPF management. To sum up, fishpond management is an essential driver for macrozoobenthos and zooplankton communities in fishponds.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Response of aquatic invertebrate communities to different management strategies in central European fishponds
Popis výsledku anglicky
Fishponds are essential ecosystems, inhabited by many different groups of biota and having commercial and non-commercial functions. Therefore, managing fishponds can be a crucial parameter affecting all biota inhabiting a given fishpond, and macrozoobenthos and zooplankton can be the most affected communities. Thus, this study investigates the effect of traditional management with high fish density and cereal co-feeding (business as usual management, BAU) and adjusted fishpond management (NP (natural production) and NPF (natural production with supplementary feeding)) on macrozoobenthos, zooplankton, and phytoplankton dynamics. This study was carried out in four fishponds for three seasons. Our results showed that seasonal community development was affected by management type, where BAU management had different community patterns compared to NP and NPF management. In contrast, taxa richness of all communities was comparable among the management. BAU management favored smaller zooplankton species compared to the adjusted NP and NPF. Notably, macrozoobenthos and phytoplankton also showed significant differences between NP and NPF management. To sum up, fishpond management is an essential driver for macrozoobenthos and zooplankton communities in fishponds.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10617 - Marine biology, freshwater biology, limnology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/QK21010131" target="_blank" >QK21010131: Optimalizace managementu jednohorkových kaprových rybníků z hlediska přikrmování a látkové bilance</a><br>
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Environmental Sciences Europe
ISSN
2190-4707
e-ISSN
2190-4715
Svazek periodika
37
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
CH - Švýcarská konfederace
Počet stran výsledku
15
Strana od-do
162
Kód UT WoS článku
001598206100004
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105019333833