Computer Assisted Versus Traditional Testing: Statistical Assessment of Students' Performance in Different Types of Tests
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60162694%3AG38__%2F16%3A00533071" target="_blank" >RIV/60162694:G38__/16:00533071 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/60162694:G42__/16:00533071
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://vavtest.unob.cz/registr" target="_blank" >http://vavtest.unob.cz/registr</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Computer Assisted Versus Traditional Testing: Statistical Assessment of Students' Performance in Different Types of Tests
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Computer technologies have opened up new possibilities for optimizing the administration of tests, test development and assessment. Computer Aided/Assisted Testing, as well as Computer Assisted Language Testing, have brought many positive aspects that can be applied in order to create a more positive attitude toward test assessment, to reduce item exposure and subsequent security risks, and provide a valid and reliable measurement of students' competence. Nowadays, teachers have a choice between supervised or unsupervised e-tests, and quite often they vote for unsupervised tests as these tests allow frequent testing of many students with fewer teaching staff, and give each student the significant freedom of choosing the time, place and manner in which to take the test. Teachers who prefer classical methods of teaching insist on paper-and-pen tests. The authors describe their experience with all of the above mentioned types of tests, and then focus on their research dealing with long-term observation of students' results and statistical assessment of their performance in English language. In this article, students' results of e-test tests and paper-and-pen tests (supervised and unsupervised) are compared in order to find any relationships among them, and to find an optimal proportion among various types of tests. Applied statistics have been applied to gain valid data when analysing different types of tests and comparing the results of these tests. Parametric and non-parametric statistical tests of the hypothesis regarding these relationships are described in the last part of this article.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Computer Assisted Versus Traditional Testing: Statistical Assessment of Students' Performance in Different Types of Tests
Popis výsledku anglicky
Computer technologies have opened up new possibilities for optimizing the administration of tests, test development and assessment. Computer Aided/Assisted Testing, as well as Computer Assisted Language Testing, have brought many positive aspects that can be applied in order to create a more positive attitude toward test assessment, to reduce item exposure and subsequent security risks, and provide a valid and reliable measurement of students' competence. Nowadays, teachers have a choice between supervised or unsupervised e-tests, and quite often they vote for unsupervised tests as these tests allow frequent testing of many students with fewer teaching staff, and give each student the significant freedom of choosing the time, place and manner in which to take the test. Teachers who prefer classical methods of teaching insist on paper-and-pen tests. The authors describe their experience with all of the above mentioned types of tests, and then focus on their research dealing with long-term observation of students' results and statistical assessment of their performance in English language. In this article, students' results of e-test tests and paper-and-pen tests (supervised and unsupervised) are compared in order to find any relationships among them, and to find an optimal proportion among various types of tests. Applied statistics have been applied to gain valid data when analysing different types of tests and comparing the results of these tests. Parametric and non-parametric statistical tests of the hypothesis regarding these relationships are described in the last part of this article.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
AM - Pedagogika a školství
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on e-Learning ECEL 2016
ISBN
978-1-911218-18-0
ISSN
2048-8637
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
650-656
Název nakladatele
Academic Conferences Limited
Místo vydání
Prague
Místo konání akce
Prague
Datum konání akce
27. 10. 2016
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—