Weaponizing Civilians: Disrupting Strategic Mobility and Logistics
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60162694%3AG38__%2F26%3A00565928" target="_blank" >RIV/60162694:G38__/26:00565928 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://connections-qj.org/article/weaponizing-civilians-disrupting-strategic-mobility-and-logistics" target="_blank" >https://connections-qj.org/article/weaponizing-civilians-disrupting-strategic-mobility-and-logistics</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11610/Connections.23.3.07" target="_blank" >10.11610/Connections.23.3.07</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Weaponizing Civilians: Disrupting Strategic Mobility and Logistics
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Strategic movement of forces and their sustainment often de-pend on civilian infrastructure (ports, airports, railways, and road net-works). During developing crises, potential adversaries could exploit seams between military and civilian authorities and use civilians to restrict, delay, or completely prevent the movement of forces and disrupt supply chains. This can be achieved indirectly, by exploiting the information environment, or directly, for instance, by inserting agitators into crowds. Many civilians, especially vulnerable groups, appear susceptible to disinformation and ma-nipulation, creating opportunities for adversaries to use them in pursuit of specific interests. However, civilians’ legal rights and entitlements, partic-ularly those enshrined under international humanitarian law, impose re-strictions on Western militaries in coping with such situations. From NATO’s perspective, this could further encourage adversaries to exploit these approaches. The article provides several case studies from different countries where civilians have disrupted military power projection. It then outlines seven hypothetical scenarios in which adversaries exploit civilians to counter the logistics and mobility of military forces. The methodological framework for developing plausible future scenarios involves drawing on past events while also leveraging creativity in future considerations, including techno-logical advances combined with human inventiveness. This approach ena-bled the authors to consider possible future developments and threats in terms of weaponizing civilians to contest military mobility. The findings presented in this article provide incentives for testing military resilience in wargame scenarios and exercises simulating disruptions to strategic mo-bility and logistics.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Weaponizing Civilians: Disrupting Strategic Mobility and Logistics
Popis výsledku anglicky
Strategic movement of forces and their sustainment often de-pend on civilian infrastructure (ports, airports, railways, and road net-works). During developing crises, potential adversaries could exploit seams between military and civilian authorities and use civilians to restrict, delay, or completely prevent the movement of forces and disrupt supply chains. This can be achieved indirectly, by exploiting the information environment, or directly, for instance, by inserting agitators into crowds. Many civilians, especially vulnerable groups, appear susceptible to disinformation and ma-nipulation, creating opportunities for adversaries to use them in pursuit of specific interests. However, civilians’ legal rights and entitlements, partic-ularly those enshrined under international humanitarian law, impose re-strictions on Western militaries in coping with such situations. From NATO’s perspective, this could further encourage adversaries to exploit these approaches. The article provides several case studies from different countries where civilians have disrupted military power projection. It then outlines seven hypothetical scenarios in which adversaries exploit civilians to counter the logistics and mobility of military forces. The methodological framework for developing plausible future scenarios involves drawing on past events while also leveraging creativity in future considerations, including techno-logical advances combined with human inventiveness. This approach ena-bled the authors to consider possible future developments and threats in terms of weaponizing civilians to contest military mobility. The findings presented in this article provide incentives for testing military resilience in wargame scenarios and exercises simulating disruptions to strategic mo-bility and logistics.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50600 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Connections: The Quarterly Journal
ISSN
1812-1098
e-ISSN
1812-2973
Svazek periodika
23
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
DE - Spolková republika Německo
Počet stran výsledku
22
Strana od-do
123-144
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105021923251