The Effectivity Comparison of TDOA Analytical Solution Methods

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60162694%3AG43__%2F15%3A00531239" target="_blank" >RIV/60162694:G43__/15:00531239 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://vavtest.unob.cz/registr" target="_blank" >http://vavtest.unob.cz/registr</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IRS.2015.7226350" target="_blank" >10.1109/IRS.2015.7226350</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Effectivity Comparison of TDOA Analytical Solution Methods

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Abstract: Analytical method has been preferred to optimize computation process and reduce errors in time difference of arrival (TDOA) method, one of the most important and well-known methods used in passive system. In this study we compared the effectivity of two TDOA analytical solution methods for determination of possible target positions - intersection points of hyperboloids. These two analytical methods gave correct solutions, explicit number of solutions as well as be able to define all possible solutions. The advantages and disadvantages of these algorithms were determined and supported by the simulation examples. The first method was based on coordinate transformation from initial system to new system, where we could solve simpler system of equations, whereas the second one was based on matrix.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Effectivity Comparison of TDOA Analytical Solution Methods

Popis výsledku anglicky

Abstract: Analytical method has been preferred to optimize computation process and reduce errors in time difference of arrival (TDOA) method, one of the most important and well-known methods used in passive system. In this study we compared the effectivity of two TDOA analytical solution methods for determination of possible target positions - intersection points of hyperboloids. These two analytical methods gave correct solutions, explicit number of solutions as well as be able to define all possible solutions. The advantages and disadvantages of these algorithms were determined and supported by the simulation examples. The first method was based on coordinate transformation from initial system to new system, where we could solve simpler system of equations, whereas the second one was based on matrix.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

KA - Vojenství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

International Radar Symposium IRS 2015, Proceeding Vo. II

ISBN

978-3-95404-853-3

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

800-805

Název nakladatele

TUHH - DGON

Místo vydání

Dresden, Germany

Místo konání akce

Dresden, Germany

Datum konání akce

1. 1. 2015

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—