Advantages and disadvantages of transabdominal preperitoneal approach and total extraperitoneal approach versus open repair of inguinal hernia

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60162694%3AG44__%2F13%3A43874770" target="_blank" >RIV/60162694:G44__/13:43874770 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/61383082:_____/13:0053

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://mmsl.cz/viCMS/soubory/pdf/MMSL_2013_1_2_WWW.pdf" target="_blank" >http://mmsl.cz/viCMS/soubory/pdf/MMSL_2013_1_2_WWW.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Advantages and disadvantages of transabdominal preperitoneal approach and total extraperitoneal approach versus open repair of inguinal hernia

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Surgical repair of inguinal hernias is one of the most common surgical procedures performed. Since endoscopic inguinal hernia repair was first reported in 1990, the operation has been refined into an attractive alternative to open hernia repair for manypatients and surgeons. Transabdominal preperitoneal approach (TAPP) and total extraperitoneal approach (TEP) are the most commonly used methods for miniinvasive inguinal hernia treatment. Employing the electronic databases MEDLINE, Pubmed and Ebscohost,these methods were compared with open techniques. Perioperative and postoperative complications, recurrent hernias and quality of life were evaluated. For patients with bilateral inguinal hernia or with recurrent inguinal hernia, endoscopic repair offerssignificant advantages over open techniques with regard to pain, recurrence risk and recovery. For unilateral primary hernias, either endoscopic or open tension - free repair with mesh can offer excellent and equivalent results.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Advantages and disadvantages of transabdominal preperitoneal approach and total extraperitoneal approach versus open repair of inguinal hernia

Popis výsledku anglicky

Surgical repair of inguinal hernias is one of the most common surgical procedures performed. Since endoscopic inguinal hernia repair was first reported in 1990, the operation has been refined into an attractive alternative to open hernia repair for manypatients and surgeons. Transabdominal preperitoneal approach (TAPP) and total extraperitoneal approach (TEP) are the most commonly used methods for miniinvasive inguinal hernia treatment. Employing the electronic databases MEDLINE, Pubmed and Ebscohost,these methods were compared with open techniques. Perioperative and postoperative complications, recurrent hernias and quality of life were evaluated. For patients with bilateral inguinal hernia or with recurrent inguinal hernia, endoscopic repair offerssignificant advantages over open techniques with regard to pain, recurrence risk and recovery. For unilateral primary hernias, either endoscopic or open tension - free repair with mesh can offer excellent and equivalent results.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FJ - Chirurgie včetně transplantologie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Military Medical Science Letters

ISSN

0372-7025

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

82

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

25-31

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—