Analysis of alkylphenols and bisphenols in soils using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60193697%3A_____%2F19%3AN0000049" target="_blank" >RIV/60193697:_____/19:N0000049 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216224:14310/21:00118726
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/figure/10.1080/03067319.2019.1679804?scroll=top&needAccess=true" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/figure/10.1080/03067319.2019.1679804?scroll=top&needAccess=true</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2019.1679804" target="_blank" >10.1080/03067319.2019.1679804</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Analysis of alkylphenols and bisphenols in soils using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Methods useful for the extraction of alkylphenols from soil samples were assessed. A comparison is made of the four extraction techniques that are most commonly used to extract phenolic compounds from soil, such as bisphenol A, bisphenol F and alkylphenols (4-t-OP, iso-NP, 4-OP and 4-n-NP). Soxhlet extraction, ultrasonic-assisted extraction (USE), accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) and the socalled Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged and Safe extraction (QuEChERS) were included. Modifications of the QuEChERS technique such as original, citrate and acetate were investigated. The effects of basic purification sorbents used for QuEChERS extracts such as a primary and secondary amine (PSA), C18 endcapped sorbents and graphitised carbon black (GCB) were tested. A derivatisation step prior to the final analyses by liquid chromatography coupled to a triple quadrupole analyser operating in tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) was performed by using dansyl chloride (DNSC). The best extraction of the monitored compounds from spiked soil was obtained using QuEChERS extraction. Recoveries of phenolic compounds using the QuEChERS technique were in the range from 67% to 114%. The lowest extraction recoveries (16–73%) were obtained using ultrasonic extraction. The QuEChERS method was successfully applied for the analysis of alkylphenols in soil samples. Instrumental limits of quantification and limits of detection ranged from 0.08 to 0.83 pg per injection and 0.02 to 0.25 pg per injection, respectively.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Analysis of alkylphenols and bisphenols in soils using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
Popis výsledku anglicky
Methods useful for the extraction of alkylphenols from soil samples were assessed. A comparison is made of the four extraction techniques that are most commonly used to extract phenolic compounds from soil, such as bisphenol A, bisphenol F and alkylphenols (4-t-OP, iso-NP, 4-OP and 4-n-NP). Soxhlet extraction, ultrasonic-assisted extraction (USE), accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) and the socalled Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged and Safe extraction (QuEChERS) were included. Modifications of the QuEChERS technique such as original, citrate and acetate were investigated. The effects of basic purification sorbents used for QuEChERS extracts such as a primary and secondary amine (PSA), C18 endcapped sorbents and graphitised carbon black (GCB) were tested. A derivatisation step prior to the final analyses by liquid chromatography coupled to a triple quadrupole analyser operating in tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) was performed by using dansyl chloride (DNSC). The best extraction of the monitored compounds from spiked soil was obtained using QuEChERS extraction. Recoveries of phenolic compounds using the QuEChERS technique were in the range from 67% to 114%. The lowest extraction recoveries (16–73%) were obtained using ultrasonic extraction. The QuEChERS method was successfully applied for the analysis of alkylphenols in soil samples. Instrumental limits of quantification and limits of detection ranged from 0.08 to 0.83 pg per injection and 0.02 to 0.25 pg per injection, respectively.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10406 - Analytical chemistry
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.
Návaznosti
N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry
ISSN
0306-7319
e-ISSN
1029-0397
Svazek periodika
neuveden
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
neuveden
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
15
Strana od-do
1-15
Kód UT WoS článku
000492108700001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85074522266