Methods of Group Decisions and Aggregation of Experts? opinions

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41110%2F10%3A22034" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41110/10:22034 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Methods of Group Decisions and Aggregation of Experts? opinions

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In many cases, the expert evaluation is the most reliable way of how to estimate result of a certain process. Estimates of several experts are usually needed for correct decisions. This chapter presents and systematically sorts methods of how to aggregate expert opinions with respect to various specifics and objectives of a requestor. Based on information theory this chapter introduces a concept of experts? consensus and discusses influence of emphasizing consensus or, oppositely, emphasizing extreme opinions of experts for selection a method for aggregation of estimates. Chapter takes into account also cases when opinions of experts have different value or weight. Text of this chapter differentiates situations, when estimated result is a binary one YES/NO or a numerical value of some attribute. Further chapter distinguishes cases, when requestor is interested only in an estimate itself or when he is interested also in a dispersion of opinions of individual experts.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Methods of Group Decisions and Aggregation of Experts? opinions

Popis výsledku anglicky

In many cases, the expert evaluation is the most reliable way of how to estimate result of a certain process. Estimates of several experts are usually needed for correct decisions. This chapter presents and systematically sorts methods of how to aggregate expert opinions with respect to various specifics and objectives of a requestor. Based on information theory this chapter introduces a concept of experts? consensus and discusses influence of emphasizing consensus or, oppositely, emphasizing extreme opinions of experts for selection a method for aggregation of estimates. Chapter takes into account also cases when opinions of experts have different value or weight. Text of this chapter differentiates situations, when estimated result is a binary one YES/NO or a numerical value of some attribute. Further chapter distinguishes cases, when requestor is interested only in an estimate itself or when he is interested also in a dispersion of opinions of individual experts.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

AE - Řízení, správa a administrativa

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/2C06004" target="_blank" >2C06004: Inteligentní nástroje pro hodnocení relevance a strukturování obsahu obecných i specializovaných zdrojů dat a znalostí</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2010

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Technologies for Supporting Reasoning Communities and Collaborative Decision Making

ISBN

978-1-60960-091-4

Počet stran výsledku

21

Strana od-do

—

Počet stran knihy

474

Název nakladatele

Information Science Reference - IGI Global

Místo vydání

New York, USA

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—