Not Not but Not yet: Present and Future in Prefigurative Politics

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41110%2F19%3A78964" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41110/19:78964 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032321717741233" target="_blank" >https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032321717741233</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0032321717741233" target="_blank" >10.1177/0032321717741233</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Not Not but Not yet: Present and Future in Prefigurative Politics

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Prefigurative politics, the idea of building the new world in the shell of the old, increasingly forms part of the common sense of radical social and political movements but deserves more careful conceptual analysis. Traditionally, such ideas have been discussed in contrast to strategic politics, but this has been challenged by recent scholarship, which has stressed that they can and should be seen as strategic. This article agrees but points to a more fundamental tension rooted in attempting to enact the future in the present. This is discussed through two broad approaches to prefiguration: ends guided and ends effacing. The former leads to a practical dilemma between acting to bring about the future and acting as if it has already been achieved. The latter addresses this, but nonetheless requires further articulation of the relationship between present and future action, which the article argues can be achieved by drawing on ideas from critical pedagogy.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Not Not but Not yet: Present and Future in Prefigurative Politics

Popis výsledku anglicky

Prefigurative politics, the idea of building the new world in the shell of the old, increasingly forms part of the common sense of radical social and political movements but deserves more careful conceptual analysis. Traditionally, such ideas have been discussed in contrast to strategic politics, but this has been challenged by recent scholarship, which has stressed that they can and should be seen as strategic. This article agrees but points to a more fundamental tension rooted in attempting to enact the future in the present. This is discussed through two broad approaches to prefiguration: ends guided and ends effacing. The former leads to a practical dilemma between acting to bring about the future and acting as if it has already been achieved. The latter addresses this, but nonetheless requires further articulation of the relationship between present and future action, which the article argues can be achieved by drawing on ideas from critical pedagogy.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

POLITICAL STUDIES

ISSN

0032-3217

e-ISSN

1467-9248

Svazek periodika

67

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

47-62

Kód UT WoS článku

000456444700004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—