COMPARISON OF TAX DEPRECIATION OF TANGIBLE FIXED ASSETS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND GERMANY
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41110%2F21%3A85387" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41110/21:85387 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
COMPARISON OF TAX DEPRECIATION OF TANGIBLE FIXED ASSETS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND GERMANY
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The aim of the paper is to compare the tax depreciation of tangible assets in the Czech Republic and Germany. Tax depreciation is similar in both countries as to the depreciation base (acquisition price or production costs) and to the officially stated useful lifetime of assets. Component depreciation is generally not permitted for tax purposes. The main difference regarding tax depreciation and reporting a depreciation expense in these countries is the ownership of leased assets (legal owner in the Czech Republic and beneficial owner in Germany). Differences were found in the applied depreciation methods (degressive depreciation is permitted in the Czech Republic but is not permitted in Germany for assets bought in 2011 onwards) and in the definition and method of depreciation of low-value assets (GWG). Tax depreciation depends on a national tax legislation and influences the tax base and the due and deferred income tax but should not influence the reported accounting depreciation and accumulated de
Název v anglickém jazyce
COMPARISON OF TAX DEPRECIATION OF TANGIBLE FIXED ASSETS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND GERMANY
Popis výsledku anglicky
The aim of the paper is to compare the tax depreciation of tangible assets in the Czech Republic and Germany. Tax depreciation is similar in both countries as to the depreciation base (acquisition price or production costs) and to the officially stated useful lifetime of assets. Component depreciation is generally not permitted for tax purposes. The main difference regarding tax depreciation and reporting a depreciation expense in these countries is the ownership of leased assets (legal owner in the Czech Republic and beneficial owner in Germany). Differences were found in the applied depreciation methods (degressive depreciation is permitted in the Czech Republic but is not permitted in Germany for assets bought in 2011 onwards) and in the definition and method of depreciation of low-value assets (GWG). Tax depreciation depends on a national tax legislation and influences the tax base and the due and deferred income tax but should not influence the reported accounting depreciation and accumulated de
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50205 - Accounting
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
5th International Scientific Conference on Opportunities and Threats to Current Business Management in a Cross-Border Comparison 2019
ISBN
978-3-86367-062-7
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
9
Strana od-do
109-117
Název nakladatele
Verlag der GUC m.b.H. Fachbuchreihe
Místo vydání
Chemnitz, Germany
Místo konání akce
Zelezna Ruda, CZECH REPUBLIC
Datum konání akce
7. 11. 2019
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
000631253900011