ECON-ESG factors on energy efficiency: Fostering sustainable development in ECON-growth-paradox countries
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41110%2F24%3A101149" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41110/24:101149 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1342937X24002144" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1342937X24002144</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2024.07.020" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.gr.2024.07.020</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
ECON-ESG factors on energy efficiency: Fostering sustainable development in ECON-growth-paradox countries
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This study examines how economic (ECON), environmental (E), social (S), and governance (G) factors affect SDG-based energy efficiency (EE) for G-7 countries. In this examination, the study, for the first time, introduces the form "ECON-ESG" defined by Isik et al. (2024c). The authors integrated economic factors (ECON) into traditional ESG since they assert that economic impacts on sustainability are undeniable. The CS-ARDL model is used with the AMG and CCEMG techniques to test its robustness. Empirical findings reveal that while economic factors (ECON) negatively impact EE, environmental factors (E) positively impact it. Based on this negative impact on EE, and of course, only within the limits of this study, we, for the first time, conceptually define and introduce G-7 as "ECON-growth-paradox and E-growth- harmonized countries." Because G-7 countries are developed economically, however, development negatively (paradoxically) affects these countries' EEs, contrary to positive effect expectations. The word "harmonized" refers to the supportive-harmonizing (positive) effect of environmental factors (E) on EE. Therefore, policymakers need to align conflicting economic and environmental policies on energy efficiency. The country-wise analysis results show that while Canada, Italy, and the USA are ECON-growthparadox countries, the UK is an E-growth-harmonized country. (c) 2024 International Association for Gondwana Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Název v anglickém jazyce
ECON-ESG factors on energy efficiency: Fostering sustainable development in ECON-growth-paradox countries
Popis výsledku anglicky
This study examines how economic (ECON), environmental (E), social (S), and governance (G) factors affect SDG-based energy efficiency (EE) for G-7 countries. In this examination, the study, for the first time, introduces the form "ECON-ESG" defined by Isik et al. (2024c). The authors integrated economic factors (ECON) into traditional ESG since they assert that economic impacts on sustainability are undeniable. The CS-ARDL model is used with the AMG and CCEMG techniques to test its robustness. Empirical findings reveal that while economic factors (ECON) negatively impact EE, environmental factors (E) positively impact it. Based on this negative impact on EE, and of course, only within the limits of this study, we, for the first time, conceptually define and introduce G-7 as "ECON-growth-paradox and E-growth- harmonized countries." Because G-7 countries are developed economically, however, development negatively (paradoxically) affects these countries' EEs, contrary to positive effect expectations. The word "harmonized" refers to the supportive-harmonizing (positive) effect of environmental factors (E) on EE. Therefore, policymakers need to align conflicting economic and environmental policies on energy efficiency. The country-wise analysis results show that while Canada, Italy, and the USA are ECON-growthparadox countries, the UK is an E-growth-harmonized country. (c) 2024 International Association for Gondwana Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50201 - Economic Theory
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
GONDWANA RESEARCH
ISSN
1342-937X
e-ISSN
1342-937X
Svazek periodika
135
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
neuvedeno
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
103-115
Kód UT WoS článku
001296276000001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—