Comparative studies of early season moxidectin treatment and conventional ivermectin /benzimidazole treatments in the control of cyathostomes in horses
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41210%2F03%3A00005431" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41210/03:00005431 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Comparative studies of early season moxidectin treatment and conventional ivermectin /benzimidazole treatments in the control of cyathostomes in horses
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Moxidectin administered in January or February in a single dose was tested for efficacy in horses on two farms 12 and 11 months, respectively. Horses were infected naturally with cyathostomes in the previous grazing period. Forty horses of farm 1 and 20horses of farm 2 were utilized in contolled tests to evaluate efficacy of a moxidectin 2 % gel formulation at the dosage of 0,4 mg moxidectin per kg of live weight, an ivermectin commercial paste formulation at the dosage 0,2 mg ivermectin per kg, a mebendazole and a fenbendazole commercial paste formulation at the dosage both 7,5 mg mebendazole and fenbendazole per kg of live weight, all applied orally. Three control groups of 10 horses each (farm 1) were treated two times per year with ivermectin andbenzimidazoles, respectively. Individual faecal egg counts, faecal cultures and larval differentiation were performed. Moxidectin had more prolonged and greater suppressive influence than did ivermectin or benzimidazoles on reappearance a
Název v anglickém jazyce
Comparative studies of early season moxidectin treatment and conventional ivermectin /benzimidazole treatments in the control of cyathostomes in horses
Popis výsledku anglicky
Moxidectin administered in January or February in a single dose was tested for efficacy in horses on two farms 12 and 11 months, respectively. Horses were infected naturally with cyathostomes in the previous grazing period. Forty horses of farm 1 and 20horses of farm 2 were utilized in contolled tests to evaluate efficacy of a moxidectin 2 % gel formulation at the dosage of 0,4 mg moxidectin per kg of live weight, an ivermectin commercial paste formulation at the dosage 0,2 mg ivermectin per kg, a mebendazole and a fenbendazole commercial paste formulation at the dosage both 7,5 mg mebendazole and fenbendazole per kg of live weight, all applied orally. Three control groups of 10 horses each (farm 1) were treated two times per year with ivermectin andbenzimidazoles, respectively. Individual faecal egg counts, faecal cultures and larval differentiation were performed. Moxidectin had more prolonged and greater suppressive influence than did ivermectin or benzimidazoles on reappearance a
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
EG - Zoologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2003
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Veterinary Medicine - Czech
ISSN
0375-8427
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
48
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1-2
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
9
Strana od-do
9-17
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—