Analysis of EU support for managed succession of agricultural land in the Czech Republic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41320%2F13%3A60433" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41320/13:60433 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Analysis of EU support for managed succession of agricultural land in the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article presents a comparison of EAFRD support for afforestation of agricultural land (managed succession) in the years of 2007?2013 and model costs required to compensate for both operational inputs and agricultural income forgone when establishingwoodland on agricultural land in the Czech Republic. The aim was to investigate whether the blanket support rates for the afforestation of agricultural land are sufficient to cover the associated costs in a wide range of site conditions. Costs were calculated for 43 groups based on forest typology. The calculation was based on the comparison of present costs and present revenues (here: European fund support) with the discount rate of 3% and a 15-year evaluation period. The analysis demonstrated that input costs vary considerably in the different forest typologies; 44% of groups show higher present costs than the support rates currently available. In the most expensive group costs are 150% higher than even an increased support rate in le

Název v anglickém jazyce

Analysis of EU support for managed succession of agricultural land in the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article presents a comparison of EAFRD support for afforestation of agricultural land (managed succession) in the years of 2007?2013 and model costs required to compensate for both operational inputs and agricultural income forgone when establishingwoodland on agricultural land in the Czech Republic. The aim was to investigate whether the blanket support rates for the afforestation of agricultural land are sufficient to cover the associated costs in a wide range of site conditions. Costs were calculated for 43 groups based on forest typology. The calculation was based on the comparison of present costs and present revenues (here: European fund support) with the discount rate of 3% and a 15-year evaluation period. The analysis demonstrated that input costs vary considerably in the different forest typologies; 44% of groups show higher present costs than the support rates currently available. In the most expensive group costs are 150% higher than even an increased support rate in le

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

GK - Lesnictví

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Land Use Policy

ISSN

0264-8377

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

35

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

N

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

237-246

Kód UT WoS článku

00324657200024

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—