Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents? characteristics

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41320%2F14%3A64381" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41320/14:64381 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/60460709:41330/14:64381

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents? characteristics

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Landscape?s visual aesthetic quality (VAQ) has been widely regarded as a valuable resource worthy of protection. Although great effort has been devoted to determining the factors driving aesthetic preferences, public consensus in judgments has been neglected in the vast majority of such studies. Therefore, the aim of our study was to analyze three main possible sources of judgment variance: landscape VAQ, landscape type, and variability among respondents. Based upon an extensive perception-based investigation including more than 400 hikers as respondents, we found that variance in respondents? judgments differed significantly among assessed landscape scenes. We discovered a significant difference in judgment variances within each investigated respondent characteristic (gender, age, education level, occupational classification, and respondent?s type of residence). Judgment variance was at the same time affected by landscape VAQ itself ? the higher the VAQ, the better the consensus. Whil

Název v anglickém jazyce

Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents? characteristics

Popis výsledku anglicky

Landscape?s visual aesthetic quality (VAQ) has been widely regarded as a valuable resource worthy of protection. Although great effort has been devoted to determining the factors driving aesthetic preferences, public consensus in judgments has been neglected in the vast majority of such studies. Therefore, the aim of our study was to analyze three main possible sources of judgment variance: landscape VAQ, landscape type, and variability among respondents. Based upon an extensive perception-based investigation including more than 400 hikers as respondents, we found that variance in respondents? judgments differed significantly among assessed landscape scenes. We discovered a significant difference in judgment variances within each investigated respondent characteristic (gender, age, education level, occupational classification, and respondent?s type of residence). Judgment variance was at the same time affected by landscape VAQ itself ? the higher the VAQ, the better the consensus. Whil

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

DO - Ochrana krajinných území

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Environmental Management

ISSN

0301-4797

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2014

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

137

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

36-44

Kód UT WoS článku

000336359100005

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—