Assessing survey-based research in forest science: Turning lemons into lemonade?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41320%2F16%3A72086" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41320/16:72086 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.07.004" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.07.004</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.07.004" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.forpol.2015.07.004</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Assessing survey-based research in forest science: Turning lemons into lemonade?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Survey-based research is the most widely applied and simultaneously most criticized approach. Whereas many disciplines failed to adhere to its fundamental principles, e.g. due to lowresponse rates, often inadequate sampling procedures, or an over-reliance on the cross-sectional approaches, in forest science no systematic evidence can be found, even though this kind of inquiry has been used for almost six decades now. We therefore examine how much research in forest science is survey-based and how its amount has developed over time? Has surveybased research in forest science matured? Has this research applied sound methodology and what are the main avenues for improvement? To find answers, we analyzed survey-based articles published in 20 forest science journals from 2005 to 2014 and found that an average of 3,2% of research was survey-based.We could identify a significant increase in the percentage of survey-based articles among the total articles published throughout the same time period. By further

Název v anglickém jazyce

Assessing survey-based research in forest science: Turning lemons into lemonade?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Survey-based research is the most widely applied and simultaneously most criticized approach. Whereas many disciplines failed to adhere to its fundamental principles, e.g. due to lowresponse rates, often inadequate sampling procedures, or an over-reliance on the cross-sectional approaches, in forest science no systematic evidence can be found, even though this kind of inquiry has been used for almost six decades now. We therefore examine how much research in forest science is survey-based and how its amount has developed over time? Has surveybased research in forest science matured? Has this research applied sound methodology and what are the main avenues for improvement? To find answers, we analyzed survey-based articles published in 20 forest science journals from 2005 to 2014 and found that an average of 3,2% of research was survey-based.We could identify a significant increase in the percentage of survey-based articles among the total articles published throughout the same time period. By further

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

GK - Lesnictví

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Forest Policy and Economics

ISSN

1389-9341

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

68

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

7

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

105-117

Kód UT WoS článku

000378431400013

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—