How close to nature is close-to-nature pine silviculture?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41320%2F16%3A73094" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41320/16:73094 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/98/2015-JFS" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/98/2015-JFS</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/98/2015-JFS" target="_blank" >10.17221/98/2015-JFS</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

How close to nature is close-to-nature pine silviculture?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Structural parameters of Scots pine stands (129-191 years) on their natural sites (270-600 m a.s.l.) are described on 6 permanent research plots (PRP 3 in managed stands using near-natural silvicultural practices and 3 in stands without active forest management for 3 decades at least) in areas of western, central and eastern Bohemia and in the Polish part of the Krkonoše Mts. In the framework of the study structural and growth parameters, horizontal and vertical structure and biodiversity were evaluated on the plots. A comparison of the plots, and of managed and unmanaged plots showed a relatively high variability in different parameters. Nevertheless, the results document that managed stands, compared to forest stands without management, mostly have significantly higher standing volumes (1,5 times in total and 1,7 times in pine), which is caused by more extreme sites. An opposite trend was found out in dead wood volume, which is distinctly higher in unmanaged stands. Differences in the other paramet

Název v anglickém jazyce

How close to nature is close-to-nature pine silviculture?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Structural parameters of Scots pine stands (129-191 years) on their natural sites (270-600 m a.s.l.) are described on 6 permanent research plots (PRP 3 in managed stands using near-natural silvicultural practices and 3 in stands without active forest management for 3 decades at least) in areas of western, central and eastern Bohemia and in the Polish part of the Krkonoše Mts. In the framework of the study structural and growth parameters, horizontal and vertical structure and biodiversity were evaluated on the plots. A comparison of the plots, and of managed and unmanaged plots showed a relatively high variability in different parameters. Nevertheless, the results document that managed stands, compared to forest stands without management, mostly have significantly higher standing volumes (1,5 times in total and 1,7 times in pine), which is caused by more extreme sites. An opposite trend was found out in dead wood volume, which is distinctly higher in unmanaged stands. Differences in the other paramet

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

GK - Lesnictví

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/QJ1520037" target="_blank" >QJ1520037: Zvyšování adaptability borového hospodářství v podmínkách České republiky</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Forest Science

ISSN

1212-4834

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

62

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

24-34

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—