Conversion of Norway spruce forests in the face of climate change: a case study in Central Europe

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41320%2F17%3A75550" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41320/17:75550 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10342-017-1028-5" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10342-017-1028-5</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10342-017-1028-5" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10342-017-1028-5</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Conversion of Norway spruce forests in the face of climate change: a case study in Central Europe

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Steadily increasing damage to Norway spruce forests in Europe has caused researchers and managers to consider whether these forests can be converted to more stable ecosystems. In a central European mountain region, we investigated whether management systems (MSs) specified by regional stakeholders provide sound alternatives to the currently applied management. We used the forest model Sibyla to explore whether the tested MSs differ in their sensitivity to climate change in terms of altered biomass production, stand structure, forest damage, and financial outcome. The tested MSs were no-management (NM), currently applied management (BAU), and management based on the preferences of forest managers (FM) or on the preferences of other stakeholders (OSH). With NM, spruce remained dominant during the simulation period 2010-2100, and the rate of damage significantly increased. Spruce also remained dominant with FM, while the abundance of non-spruce species significantly increased with BAU and OSH. The rate

Název v anglickém jazyce

Conversion of Norway spruce forests in the face of climate change: a case study in Central Europe

Popis výsledku anglicky

Steadily increasing damage to Norway spruce forests in Europe has caused researchers and managers to consider whether these forests can be converted to more stable ecosystems. In a central European mountain region, we investigated whether management systems (MSs) specified by regional stakeholders provide sound alternatives to the currently applied management. We used the forest model Sibyla to explore whether the tested MSs differ in their sensitivity to climate change in terms of altered biomass production, stand structure, forest damage, and financial outcome. The tested MSs were no-management (NM), currently applied management (BAU), and management based on the preferences of forest managers (FM) or on the preferences of other stakeholders (OSH). With NM, spruce remained dominant during the simulation period 2010-2100, and the rate of damage significantly increased. Spruce also remained dominant with FM, while the abundance of non-spruce species significantly increased with BAU and OSH. The rate

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

40102 - Forestry

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Journal of Forest Research

ISSN

1612-4669

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

136

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

5-6

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

1013-1028

Kód UT WoS článku

000417160500018

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85012217342