Effectiveness of Natura 2000 system for habitat types protection: A case study from the Czech Republic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41320%2F18%3A77719" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41320/18:77719 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/86652079:_____/18:00495469 RIV/61989592:15310/18:73587794 RIV/61989592:15410/18:73587794

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.24.21608" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.24.21608</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.24.21608" target="_blank" >10.3897/natureconservation.24.21608</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Effectiveness of Natura 2000 system for habitat types protection: A case study from the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In conservation biology, there is a general consensus that protected areas (PAs) are one of the most effective tools for biodiversity protection. Worldwide, the area of PAs is continually increasing. But is the effectiveness of biodiversity protection improving with it? Since many PAs only exist as paper parks (i.e. they exist on maps and in legislation but offer little actual protection), the answer is uncertain. Moreover, it has long been known that, not only an increase in the extent of PAs, but also the efficiency of their management is fundamentally important for effective nature conservation. Therefore, there is a wide-ranging discussion about the actual effectiveness of PAs and factors that influence it. In the course of the EU pre-accession phase, a comprehensive field mapping of natural habitats took place in the Czech Republic in years 2001-2004. The mapping results were used to designate Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) as part of the Natura 2000 network. In this study, the aim

Název v anglickém jazyce

Effectiveness of Natura 2000 system for habitat types protection: A case study from the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku anglicky

In conservation biology, there is a general consensus that protected areas (PAs) are one of the most effective tools for biodiversity protection. Worldwide, the area of PAs is continually increasing. But is the effectiveness of biodiversity protection improving with it? Since many PAs only exist as paper parks (i.e. they exist on maps and in legislation but offer little actual protection), the answer is uncertain. Moreover, it has long been known that, not only an increase in the extent of PAs, but also the efficiency of their management is fundamentally important for effective nature conservation. Therefore, there is a wide-ranging discussion about the actual effectiveness of PAs and factors that influence it. In the course of the EU pre-accession phase, a comprehensive field mapping of natural habitats took place in the Czech Republic in years 2001-2004. The mapping results were used to designate Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) as part of the Natura 2000 network. In this study, the aim

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10619 - Biodiversity conservation

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/LO1415" target="_blank" >LO1415: CzechGlobe 2020 - Rozvoj Centra pro studium dopadů globální změny klimatu</a><br>

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Nature Conservation-Bulgaria

ISSN

1314-6947

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

24

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

BG - Bulharská republika

Počet stran výsledku

21

Strana od-do

21-41

Kód UT WoS článku

000419680500002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85040517798