Differences in Timber Volume Estimates Using Various Algorithms Available in the Control and Information Systems of Harvesters

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41320%2F19%3A80610" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41320/19:80610 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/60460709:41340/19:80610

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/10/5/388/htm" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/10/5/388/htm</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f10050388" target="_blank" >10.3390/f10050388</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Differences in Timber Volume Estimates Using Various Algorithms Available in the Control and Information Systems of Harvesters

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Timber is the most important source of revenue in forestry and, therefore, is necessary to precisely estimate its volume. The share of timber volume produced by harvesters is annually growing in many European countries. Suitable settings of harvesters will allow us to achieve the most accurate volume estimates of the produced timber. In this study, we compared the different methods of log volume estimation applied by control and information systems of harvesters. The aim was to analyze the price categories that can be set up in the StanForD standard and to determine the differences between the algorithms used for log volume estimations. We obtained the data from .STM files collected from March 2017 until June 2018 on a medium-size harvester. We analyzed price categories and found seven different algorithms used to estimate the log volumes. Log volume estimates according to Algorithm A2 were considered as standard because these estimates should be closest to the true log volumes. Significant differenc

Název v anglickém jazyce

Differences in Timber Volume Estimates Using Various Algorithms Available in the Control and Information Systems of Harvesters

Popis výsledku anglicky

Timber is the most important source of revenue in forestry and, therefore, is necessary to precisely estimate its volume. The share of timber volume produced by harvesters is annually growing in many European countries. Suitable settings of harvesters will allow us to achieve the most accurate volume estimates of the produced timber. In this study, we compared the different methods of log volume estimation applied by control and information systems of harvesters. The aim was to analyze the price categories that can be set up in the StanForD standard and to determine the differences between the algorithms used for log volume estimations. We obtained the data from .STM files collected from March 2017 until June 2018 on a medium-size harvester. We analyzed price categories and found seven different algorithms used to estimate the log volumes. Log volume estimates according to Algorithm A2 were considered as standard because these estimates should be closest to the true log volumes. Significant differenc

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

40102 - Forestry

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

FORESTS

ISSN

1999-4907

e-ISSN

1999-4907

Svazek periodika

10

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

5

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

1-14

Kód UT WoS článku

000478814700027

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85066255281