Choice of reference climate conditions matters in impact studies: Case of bias-corrected CORDEX data set
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41320%2F19%3A81161" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41320/19:81161 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.5930" target="_blank" >https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.5930</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joc.5930" target="_blank" >10.1002/joc.5930</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Choice of reference climate conditions matters in impact studies: Case of bias-corrected CORDEX data set
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Climate models have provided driving data for impact studies for decades. However, the uncertainties related to the use of such data have typically not been sufficiently considered. We investigate how CORDEX climate simulations, which were corrected for bias based on MESAN reanalysis data for the period of 1989-2010, match the gridded observational data set E-OBS. Furthermore, we investigate whether the bias-corrected simulations contain significant residual bias (RB), which we defined as the bias exceeding the range of the observational uncertainty (U-obs) that emerges from differences between the two data sets MESAN and E-OBS. Because the reference period selected in climate change impact studies often differs from the period used for bias correction, we further investigated whether the RB and other performance metrics of the periods 1989-2010 and 1961-1990 differ. We conducted this assessment for whole Europe and for biogeographical zones.Most of the used performance metrics show a good match of t
Název v anglickém jazyce
Choice of reference climate conditions matters in impact studies: Case of bias-corrected CORDEX data set
Popis výsledku anglicky
Climate models have provided driving data for impact studies for decades. However, the uncertainties related to the use of such data have typically not been sufficiently considered. We investigate how CORDEX climate simulations, which were corrected for bias based on MESAN reanalysis data for the period of 1989-2010, match the gridded observational data set E-OBS. Furthermore, we investigate whether the bias-corrected simulations contain significant residual bias (RB), which we defined as the bias exceeding the range of the observational uncertainty (U-obs) that emerges from differences between the two data sets MESAN and E-OBS. Because the reference period selected in climate change impact studies often differs from the period used for bias correction, we further investigated whether the RB and other performance metrics of the periods 1989-2010 and 1961-1990 differ. We conducted this assessment for whole Europe and for biogeographical zones.Most of the used performance metrics show a good match of t
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10509 - Meteorology and atmospheric sciences
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY
ISSN
0899-8418
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
39
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
19
Strana od-do
2022-2040
Kód UT WoS článku
000465456400014
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85059001668