Field evaluation of synthetic and neem-derived alternative insecticides in developing action thresholds against cauliflower pests
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41320%2F19%3A81958" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41320/19:81958 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-44080-y" target="_blank" >https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-44080-y</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44080-y" target="_blank" >10.1038/s41598-019-44080-y</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Field evaluation of synthetic and neem-derived alternative insecticides in developing action thresholds against cauliflower pests
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Synthetic chemical pesticides can enhance crop yields but also have undesired effects. Alternative botanical insecticides may also have non-target effects on pollinators and biocontrol services. Employing action thresholds (ATs) can reduce pesticide (whether synthetic or botanical) use compared to fixed-interval applications. Here the azadirachtin-based botanical formulation NeemAzal and a neem seed extract (NSE) were evaluated in field spraying trials alongside commonly-used synthetics (Voliam Flexi chlorentraniliprole plus thiamethoxam and imidacloprid) in developing ATs for the regular and cosmopolitan cauliflower pests Brevicoryne brassicae, Plutella xylostella and Spodoptera litura. We considered the size of the S. litura larvae infesting the crop in order to derive ATs. ATs per plant were higher for NeemAzal (0,55 larvae for P. xylostella and 3 larvae for large-sized S. litura) than for Voliam Flexi (0,30 larvae for P. xylostella and 0,80 larvae for S. litura) but were similar for B. brassicae
Název v anglickém jazyce
Field evaluation of synthetic and neem-derived alternative insecticides in developing action thresholds against cauliflower pests
Popis výsledku anglicky
Synthetic chemical pesticides can enhance crop yields but also have undesired effects. Alternative botanical insecticides may also have non-target effects on pollinators and biocontrol services. Employing action thresholds (ATs) can reduce pesticide (whether synthetic or botanical) use compared to fixed-interval applications. Here the azadirachtin-based botanical formulation NeemAzal and a neem seed extract (NSE) were evaluated in field spraying trials alongside commonly-used synthetics (Voliam Flexi chlorentraniliprole plus thiamethoxam and imidacloprid) in developing ATs for the regular and cosmopolitan cauliflower pests Brevicoryne brassicae, Plutella xylostella and Spodoptera litura. We considered the size of the S. litura larvae infesting the crop in order to derive ATs. ATs per plant were higher for NeemAzal (0,55 larvae for P. xylostella and 3 larvae for large-sized S. litura) than for Voliam Flexi (0,30 larvae for P. xylostella and 0,80 larvae for S. litura) but were similar for B. brassicae
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10616 - Entomology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Scientific Reports
ISSN
2045-2322
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
9
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
7684
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
13
Strana od-do
1-13
Kód UT WoS článku
000468600400001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85066144061