The impact is in the details: evaluating a standardized protocol and scale for determining non-native insect impact

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41320%2F20%3A84998" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41320/20:84998 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://neobiota.pensoft.net/article/38981/" target="_blank" >https://neobiota.pensoft.net/article/38981/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.55.38981" target="_blank" >10.3897/neobiota.55.38981</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The impact is in the details: evaluating a standardized protocol and scale for determining non-native insect impact

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Assessing the ecological and economic impacts of non-native species is crucial to providing managers and policymakers with the information necessary to respond effectively. Most non-native species have minimal impacts on the environment in which they are introduced, but a small fraction are highly deleterious. The definition of damaging or high-impact varies based on the Factors determined to be valuable by an individual or group, but interpretations of whether non-native species meet particular definitions can be influenced by the interpreter s bias or level of expertise, or lack of group consensus. Uncertainty or disagreement about an impact classification may delay or otherwise adversely affect policymaking on management strategies. One way to prevent these issues would be to have a detailed, nine-point impact scale that would leave little room for interpretation and then divide the scale into agreed upon categories, such as low, medium, and high impact. Following a previously conducted, exhaustiv

Název v anglickém jazyce

The impact is in the details: evaluating a standardized protocol and scale for determining non-native insect impact

Popis výsledku anglicky

Assessing the ecological and economic impacts of non-native species is crucial to providing managers and policymakers with the information necessary to respond effectively. Most non-native species have minimal impacts on the environment in which they are introduced, but a small fraction are highly deleterious. The definition of damaging or high-impact varies based on the Factors determined to be valuable by an individual or group, but interpretations of whether non-native species meet particular definitions can be influenced by the interpreter s bias or level of expertise, or lack of group consensus. Uncertainty or disagreement about an impact classification may delay or otherwise adversely affect policymaking on management strategies. One way to prevent these issues would be to have a detailed, nine-point impact scale that would leave little room for interpretation and then divide the scale into agreed upon categories, such as low, medium, and high impact. Following a previously conducted, exhaustiv

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10619 - Biodiversity conservation

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

NeoBiota

ISSN

1619-0033

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

55

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2020

Stát vydavatele periodika

BG - Bulharská republika

Počet stran výsledku

23

Strana od-do

61-83

Kód UT WoS článku

000526125200003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85084296442