Evaluating the mitigation effectiveness of forests managed for conservation versus commodity production using an Australian example

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41320%2F22%3A92998" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41320/22:92998 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/conl.12878" target="_blank" >https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/conl.12878</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/conl.12878" target="_blank" >10.1111/conl.12878</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Evaluating the mitigation effectiveness of forests managed for conservation versus commodity production using an Australian example

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Forests are critical for biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation: reducing emissions, increasing removals, and providing resilient ecosystems with stable long-term carbon storage. However, evaluating the mitigation effectiveness of forests managed for conservation versus commodity production has been long debated. We assessed factors influencing evaluation of mitigation effectiveness--land area, time horizon, reference level, carbon stock longevity--and tested the outcomes using analyses of carbon dynamics from an Australian ecosystem. Results showed that landscape scale accounting using carbon carrying capacity as the reference level and assessed over a series of time horizons best enables explicit evaluation of mitigation benefits. Time horizons need to differentiate between near-term emissions reduction targets (2030 and 2050), relative longevity of carbon stocks in different reservoirs, and long-term impacts on atmospheric CO2 concentration. Greatest mitigation benefits derive fro

Název v anglickém jazyce

Evaluating the mitigation effectiveness of forests managed for conservation versus commodity production using an Australian example

Popis výsledku anglicky

Forests are critical for biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation: reducing emissions, increasing removals, and providing resilient ecosystems with stable long-term carbon storage. However, evaluating the mitigation effectiveness of forests managed for conservation versus commodity production has been long debated. We assessed factors influencing evaluation of mitigation effectiveness--land area, time horizon, reference level, carbon stock longevity--and tested the outcomes using analyses of carbon dynamics from an Australian ecosystem. Results showed that landscape scale accounting using carbon carrying capacity as the reference level and assessed over a series of time horizons best enables explicit evaluation of mitigation benefits. Time horizons need to differentiate between near-term emissions reduction targets (2030 and 2050), relative longevity of carbon stocks in different reservoirs, and long-term impacts on atmospheric CO2 concentration. Greatest mitigation benefits derive fro

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10619 - Biodiversity conservation

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Conservation Letters

ISSN

1755-263X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

15

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

1-11

Kód UT WoS článku

000760269300001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85125947276