Asymmetrical insect invasions between three world regions

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41320%2F24%3AN0000023" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41320/24:N0000023 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://neobiota.pensoft.net/article/110942/" target="_blank" >https://neobiota.pensoft.net/article/110942/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.90.110942" target="_blank" >10.3897/neobiota.90.110942</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Asymmetrical insect invasions between three world regions

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The geographical exchange of non-native species can be highly asymmetrical, with some world regions donating or receiving more species than others. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain such asymmetries, including differences in propagule pressure, source species (invader) pools, environmental features in recipient regions, or biological traits of invaders. We quantified spatiotemporal patterns in the exchange of non-native insects between Europe, North America, and Australasia, and then tested possible explanations for these patterns based on regional trade (import values) and model estimates of invader pool sizes. Europe was the dominant donor of non-native insect species between the three regions, with most of this asymmetry arising prior to 1950. This could not be explained by differences in import values (1827-2014), nor were there substantial differences in the sizes of modelled invader pools. Based on ad-ditional evidence from literature, we propose that patterns of historical plant introductions may explain these asymmetries, but this possibility requires further study.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Asymmetrical insect invasions between three world regions

Popis výsledku anglicky

The geographical exchange of non-native species can be highly asymmetrical, with some world regions donating or receiving more species than others. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain such asymmetries, including differences in propagule pressure, source species (invader) pools, environmental features in recipient regions, or biological traits of invaders. We quantified spatiotemporal patterns in the exchange of non-native insects between Europe, North America, and Australasia, and then tested possible explanations for these patterns based on regional trade (import values) and model estimates of invader pool sizes. Europe was the dominant donor of non-native insect species between the three regions, with most of this asymmetry arising prior to 1950. This could not be explained by differences in import values (1827-2014), nor were there substantial differences in the sizes of modelled invader pools. Based on ad-ditional evidence from literature, we propose that patterns of historical plant introductions may explain these asymmetries, but this possibility requires further study.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10600 - Biological sciences

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/EF16_019%2F0000803" target="_blank" >EF16_019/0000803: Excelentní Výzkum jako podpora Adaptace lesnictví a dřevařství na globální změnu a 4. průmyslovou revoluci</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

NeoBiota

ISSN

1619-0033

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

90

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

16

Stát vydavatele periodika

BG - Bulharská republika

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

35-51

Kód UT WoS článku

001145061000001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85187105488