Integrating Technical, Socio-Economic, and Sustainability Dimensions for Spatial Stratification of Ecosystem Services Using the AHP Method

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41320%2F25%3A103861" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41320/25:103861 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-025-02224-z" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-025-02224-z</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02224-z" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00267-025-02224-z</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Integrating Technical, Socio-Economic, and Sustainability Dimensions for Spatial Stratification of Ecosystem Services Using the AHP Method

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Forest management is inherently complex, requiring a multi-dimensional approach to set management goals that balance the competing demands of ecosystem services, public expectations, and scientific-political considerations. This study addresses the necessity for recognising, prioritizing, and spatially stratifying ecosystem services (ES) based on technical suitability, stakeholder involvement, and the categories of sustainability within Turkey's forest ecosystem management framework in Yaln & imath;z & ccedil;am case study area. By leveraging Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods, particularly the Delphi technique with Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), this research captures both scientific ground and perspectives of various sectors with a stratification model to determine ES provisions. The iterative framework includes ES identification and prioritization steps, culminating in their spatial stratification of forest stands with geographic information system. The results indicate that ES stratification highlighted the primary focus on biodiversity conservation (78.5%) and water protection (13.3%), with minimal provision for timber production (7.9%) and soil protection (0.04%), and none for climate regulation, eco-tourism, and non-wood forest products. This approach enables a more efficient spatial zoning strategy, balancing technical and socio-cultural factors, and streamlining decision-making processes crucial for sustainable forest management paradigm.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Integrating Technical, Socio-Economic, and Sustainability Dimensions for Spatial Stratification of Ecosystem Services Using the AHP Method

Popis výsledku anglicky

Forest management is inherently complex, requiring a multi-dimensional approach to set management goals that balance the competing demands of ecosystem services, public expectations, and scientific-political considerations. This study addresses the necessity for recognising, prioritizing, and spatially stratifying ecosystem services (ES) based on technical suitability, stakeholder involvement, and the categories of sustainability within Turkey's forest ecosystem management framework in Yaln & imath;z & ccedil;am case study area. By leveraging Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods, particularly the Delphi technique with Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), this research captures both scientific ground and perspectives of various sectors with a stratification model to determine ES provisions. The iterative framework includes ES identification and prioritization steps, culminating in their spatial stratification of forest stands with geographic information system. The results indicate that ES stratification highlighted the primary focus on biodiversity conservation (78.5%) and water protection (13.3%), with minimal provision for timber production (7.9%) and soil protection (0.04%), and none for climate regulation, eco-tourism, and non-wood forest products. This approach enables a more efficient spatial zoning strategy, balancing technical and socio-cultural factors, and streamlining decision-making processes crucial for sustainable forest management paradigm.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/QK21010354" target="_blank" >QK21010354: Progresivní metody hospodářsko-úpravnického plánování pro podporu trvale udržitelného lesního hospodářství</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Environmental Management

ISSN

0364-152X

e-ISSN

0364-152X

Svazek periodika

75

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

10

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

2777-2794

Kód UT WoS článku

001528283200001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—