Which breeding bird categories should we use in models of species distribution?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41330%2F17%3A71799" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41330/17:71799 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.006" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.006</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.006" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.006</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Which breeding bird categories should we use in models of species distribution?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Studies often use breeding bird atlases to assess species habitat requirements or to estimate species potential distribution under environmental changes. In breeding bird atlases, one of the attributes recorded for each grid square is evidence of breeding. The attribute represent probability of breeding (confirmed, probable, possible) categorized according to breeding behaviour. However, the majority of studies often make arbitrary decisions on which category to use. This may have severe consequences for results. This study evaluated whether models discrimination ability change by inclusion of ambiguous breeding categories (probable, possible). We compared models predictions for distribution of nine wetland birds derived from Atlas of the breeding distribution of birds in the Czech Republic. For each species, we developed generalized linear models using combinations of the breeding categories as input to model calibration and validation. Our results show that the discrimination ability (AUC)

Název v anglickém jazyce

Which breeding bird categories should we use in models of species distribution?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Studies often use breeding bird atlases to assess species habitat requirements or to estimate species potential distribution under environmental changes. In breeding bird atlases, one of the attributes recorded for each grid square is evidence of breeding. The attribute represent probability of breeding (confirmed, probable, possible) categorized according to breeding behaviour. However, the majority of studies often make arbitrary decisions on which category to use. This may have severe consequences for results. This study evaluated whether models discrimination ability change by inclusion of ambiguous breeding categories (probable, possible). We compared models predictions for distribution of nine wetland birds derived from Atlas of the breeding distribution of birds in the Czech Republic. For each species, we developed generalized linear models using combinations of the breeding categories as input to model calibration and validation. Our results show that the discrimination ability (AUC)

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10615 - Ornithology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS

ISSN

1470-160X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2017

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

74

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

4

Strana od-do

526-529

Kód UT WoS článku

000398334500047

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85006516053