A Comprehensive Distributed Hydrological Modeling Intercomparison to Support Process Representation and Data Collection Strategies
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41330%2F19%3A79136" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41330/19:79136 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018WR023941" target="_blank" >https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018WR023941</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023941" target="_blank" >10.1029/2018WR023941</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
A Comprehensive Distributed Hydrological Modeling Intercomparison to Support Process Representation and Data Collection Strategies
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The improvement of process representations in hydrological models is often only driven by the modelers knowledge and data availability. We present a comprehensive comparison between two hydrological models of different complexity that is developed to support (1) the understanding of the differences between model structures and (2) the identification of the observations needed for model assessment and improvement. The comparison is conducted on both space and time and by aggregating the outputs at different spatiotemporal scales. In the present study, mHM, a process-based hydrological model, and ParFlow-CLM, an integrated subsurface-surface hydrological model, are used. The models are applied in a mesoscale catchment in Germany. Both models agree in the simulated river discharge at the outlet and the surface soil moisture dynamics, lending their supports for some model applications (drought monitoring). Different model sensitivities are, however, found when comparing evapotranspiration and soil moistu
Název v anglickém jazyce
A Comprehensive Distributed Hydrological Modeling Intercomparison to Support Process Representation and Data Collection Strategies
Popis výsledku anglicky
The improvement of process representations in hydrological models is often only driven by the modelers knowledge and data availability. We present a comprehensive comparison between two hydrological models of different complexity that is developed to support (1) the understanding of the differences between model structures and (2) the identification of the observations needed for model assessment and improvement. The comparison is conducted on both space and time and by aggregating the outputs at different spatiotemporal scales. In the present study, mHM, a process-based hydrological model, and ParFlow-CLM, an integrated subsurface-surface hydrological model, are used. The models are applied in a mesoscale catchment in Germany. Both models agree in the simulated river discharge at the outlet and the surface soil moisture dynamics, lending their supports for some model applications (drought monitoring). Different model sensitivities are, however, found when comparing evapotranspiration and soil moistu
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10501 - Hydrology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
ISSN
0043-1397
e-ISSN
1944-7973
Svazek periodika
55
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
21
Strana od-do
990-1010
Kód UT WoS článku
000461858900008
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85061335592