A contested transition toward a coal-free future: Advocacy coalitions and coal policy in the Czech Republic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41330%2F19%3A79589" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41330/19:79589 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216224:14230/19:00112210

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629618313513?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629618313513?via%3Dihub</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101283" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.erss.2019.101283</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A contested transition toward a coal-free future: Advocacy coalitions and coal policy in the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Using data from an organizational survey and social network analysis techniques, we identify two competing and ideologically distant coalitions: The Industry Coalition and Environmental Coalition. The results further show high fragmentation among decision-makers, as indicated by their cross-coalition membership and the heterogeneity of their policy beliefs. The decision-makers are targeted by principal members of both coalitions, i.e. environmental non-governmental organizations and industry, but also by research organizations. Lastly, expert information exchange strongly overlaps with the identified coalitions and thus increases their cohesiveness. It is argued that such subsystem configuration limits the potential for policy change through negotiated agreement or policy learning. Policy brokers and policy venues are suggested as remedies to moderate the adversarial nature of the subsystem.

Název v anglickém jazyce

A contested transition toward a coal-free future: Advocacy coalitions and coal policy in the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku anglicky

Using data from an organizational survey and social network analysis techniques, we identify two competing and ideologically distant coalitions: The Industry Coalition and Environmental Coalition. The results further show high fragmentation among decision-makers, as indicated by their cross-coalition membership and the heterogeneity of their policy beliefs. The decision-makers are targeted by principal members of both coalitions, i.e. environmental non-governmental organizations and industry, but also by research organizations. Lastly, expert information exchange strongly overlaps with the identified coalitions and thus increases their cohesiveness. It is argued that such subsystem configuration limits the potential for policy change through negotiated agreement or policy learning. Policy brokers and policy venues are suggested as remedies to moderate the adversarial nature of the subsystem.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50401 - Sociology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE

ISSN

2214-6296

e-ISSN

2214-6326

Svazek periodika

2019

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

58

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

1-13

Kód UT WoS článku

000498882200001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85072763458