Incomplete species lists produced by pitfall trapping: How many carabid species and which functional traits are missing?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41330%2F20%3A82085" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41330/20:82085 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00083232:_____/20:N0000009

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108545" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108545</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108545" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108545</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Incomplete species lists produced by pitfall trapping: How many carabid species and which functional traits are missing?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Pitfall trapping is a widely used sampling technique that is standardly employed to collect various data on ground-dwelling arthropods. However, the validity of this method as a quantitative tool has been repeatedly questioned as the representation of species is influenced by their relative activity and some species are only rarely collected using pitfall traps. In this study, we compared species lists of carabid beetles recorded by pitfall trapping and hand searching techniques at 41 sites covering a range of typical habitats present in the Czech Republic. The number of species and their conservation values, the mean species trait values and phylogenetic composition of assemblages were compared between the methods. In general, hand searching performed by an experienced entomologist can record almost twice as many carabid species compared to pitfall trapping using an intermediate sampling effort (i.e., 5 to 12 pitfall traps per site exposed for an entire vegetation season and 50 to 120 min of hand se

Název v anglickém jazyce

Incomplete species lists produced by pitfall trapping: How many carabid species and which functional traits are missing?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Pitfall trapping is a widely used sampling technique that is standardly employed to collect various data on ground-dwelling arthropods. However, the validity of this method as a quantitative tool has been repeatedly questioned as the representation of species is influenced by their relative activity and some species are only rarely collected using pitfall traps. In this study, we compared species lists of carabid beetles recorded by pitfall trapping and hand searching techniques at 41 sites covering a range of typical habitats present in the Czech Republic. The number of species and their conservation values, the mean species trait values and phylogenetic composition of assemblages were compared between the methods. In general, hand searching performed by an experienced entomologist can record almost twice as many carabid species compared to pitfall trapping using an intermediate sampling effort (i.e., 5 to 12 pitfall traps per site exposed for an entire vegetation season and 50 to 120 min of hand se

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10619 - Biodiversity conservation

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA18-26542S" target="_blank" >GA18-26542S: Mimoprodukční ostrovy uvnitř polí: ohniska lokální biodiverzity a zdroje cenných ekosystémových služeb?</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Biological Conservation

ISSN

0006-3207

e-ISSN

1873-2917

Svazek periodika

245

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

108545

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

1-9

Kód UT WoS článku

000532824200017

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85084069181