Quality and usability challenges of global marine biodiversity databases: An example for marine mammal data

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41330%2F20%3A82228" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41330/20:82228 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954120300017" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954120300017</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2020.101051" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ecoinf.2020.101051</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Quality and usability challenges of global marine biodiversity databases: An example for marine mammal data

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Knowing spatial and temporal patterns of species distribution is paramount to support marine species persistence. While datasets provided by global aggregators are increasingly rich and useful, they suffer from various types of data quality issues that can impact their usage. Using marine mammals as an example, we assessed the quality and information gaps in species distribution data from three major databases: the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), the Ocean Biogeographic Information System (OBIS) and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) range maps. We analysed marine mammal records from 2015 (n = 1,396,581) and from 2019 (n = 1,904,968), for six types of common quality or usability issues. Results for both OBIS and GBIF indicate that 35 to 55 (depending on the respective database and year) of individual databases records are potential duplicates, fall on land, or miss a data collection date. The positional accuracy of data records varies greatly due to varying pre

Název v anglickém jazyce

Quality and usability challenges of global marine biodiversity databases: An example for marine mammal data

Popis výsledku anglicky

Knowing spatial and temporal patterns of species distribution is paramount to support marine species persistence. While datasets provided by global aggregators are increasingly rich and useful, they suffer from various types of data quality issues that can impact their usage. Using marine mammals as an example, we assessed the quality and information gaps in species distribution data from three major databases: the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), the Ocean Biogeographic Information System (OBIS) and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) range maps. We analysed marine mammal records from 2015 (n = 1,396,581) and from 2019 (n = 1,904,968), for six types of common quality or usability issues. Results for both OBIS and GBIF indicate that 35 to 55 (depending on the respective database and year) of individual databases records are potential duplicates, fall on land, or miss a data collection date. The positional accuracy of data records varies greatly due to varying pre

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10618 - Ecology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Ecological Informatics

ISSN

1574-9541

e-ISSN

1878-0512

Svazek periodika

2020

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

56

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

1-10

Kód UT WoS článku

000519656700007

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85077917436