Assessing the Management Effectiveness of Three Protected Areas in Ghana
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41330%2F21%3A87002" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41330/21:87002 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/60460709:41340/21:87002
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26979974.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26979974.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_20_28" target="_blank" >10.4103/cs.cs_20_28</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Assessing the Management Effectiveness of Three Protected Areas in Ghana
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Assessments of management effectiveness of protected areas offer vital information about threats and management issues at the protected area. However, these assessments are frequently conducted mainly at the internal management level, without input from the local communities that implicitly influence the resources of the protected areas. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of three protected areas in Ghana, Kogyae Strict Nature Reserve, Gbele Resource Reserve, and Kalakpa Resource Reserve using the Rapid Assessment and Prioritisation of Protected Areas Management assessment tool. The study included workshops with park managers and representatives from local communities, district assemblies, and the Environmental Protection Agency. Poaching, settlements, agricultural encroachment, poverty in nearby communities, and bush fires were identified as common pressures to all the assessed protected areas. The degree of these pressures was influenced by little or no funding, poor com
Název v anglickém jazyce
Assessing the Management Effectiveness of Three Protected Areas in Ghana
Popis výsledku anglicky
Assessments of management effectiveness of protected areas offer vital information about threats and management issues at the protected area. However, these assessments are frequently conducted mainly at the internal management level, without input from the local communities that implicitly influence the resources of the protected areas. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of three protected areas in Ghana, Kogyae Strict Nature Reserve, Gbele Resource Reserve, and Kalakpa Resource Reserve using the Rapid Assessment and Prioritisation of Protected Areas Management assessment tool. The study included workshops with park managers and representatives from local communities, district assemblies, and the Environmental Protection Agency. Poaching, settlements, agricultural encroachment, poverty in nearby communities, and bush fires were identified as common pressures to all the assessed protected areas. The degree of these pressures was influenced by little or no funding, poor com
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Conservation & Society
ISSN
0972-4923
e-ISSN
0975-3133
Svazek periodika
19
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
IN - Indická republika
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
13-24
Kód UT WoS článku
000621017300003
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85101418099