Seasonality, vegetation structure, and prey location modulate predation rates in the field margins of horticultural farms
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41330%2F25%3A101979" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41330/25:101979 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2025.2481455" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2025.2481455</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2025.2481455" target="_blank" >10.1080/21683565.2025.2481455</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Seasonality, vegetation structure, and prey location modulate predation rates in the field margins of horticultural farms
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Farm management, field margin vegetation, and predator foraging preferences can all shape biological pest control. We examined the interactive effects of agroecological vs. conventional practices, woody vs. herbaceous margins, and prey location (ground vs. plant) on predation rates in two contrasting seasons. Predation by arthropods, rodents, and birds was quantified in field margins using artificial caterpillars. Predation rates were similar in both management practices, highlighting the role of these semi-natural areas as refuges of predators. Overall, predation was higher in the summer, in herbaceous margins, and on the ground, with variations in the contribution of predator groups. Predator groups exhibited spatial and temporal complementarity, as evidenced by their differential contributions across vegetation types, prey locations, and seasons.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Seasonality, vegetation structure, and prey location modulate predation rates in the field margins of horticultural farms
Popis výsledku anglicky
Farm management, field margin vegetation, and predator foraging preferences can all shape biological pest control. We examined the interactive effects of agroecological vs. conventional practices, woody vs. herbaceous margins, and prey location (ground vs. plant) on predation rates in two contrasting seasons. Predation by arthropods, rodents, and birds was quantified in field margins using artificial caterpillars. Predation rates were similar in both management practices, highlighting the role of these semi-natural areas as refuges of predators. Overall, predation was higher in the summer, in herbaceous margins, and on the ground, with variations in the contribution of predator groups. Predator groups exhibited spatial and temporal complementarity, as evidenced by their differential contributions across vegetation types, prey locations, and seasons.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
40101 - Agriculture
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/SS02030018" target="_blank" >SS02030018: Centrum pro krajinu a biodiverzitu</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems
ISSN
2168-3565
e-ISSN
2168-3565
Svazek periodika
49
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
8
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
20
Strana od-do
1255-1274
Kód UT WoS článku
001451049500001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105001029290