Oxygen evolution catalysts under proton exchange membrane conditions in a conventional three electrode cell vs. electrolyser device: a comparison study and a 3D-printed electrolyser for academic labs dagger

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60461373%3A22310%2F21%3A43924026" target="_blank" >RIV/60461373:22310/21:43924026 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216305:26620/21:PU141033

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2021/ta/d1ta00633a" target="_blank" >https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2021/ta/d1ta00633a</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ta00633a" target="_blank" >10.1039/d1ta00633a</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Oxygen evolution catalysts under proton exchange membrane conditions in a conventional three electrode cell vs. electrolyser device: a comparison study and a 3D-printed electrolyser for academic labs dagger

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Developing active and stable oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalysts that can operate in electrolyser environments is of utmost important in order to produce H-2 gas for electricity generation. Currently in academia, many of these studies are carried out in conventional three-electrode cell set-ups; however, this configuration may not accurately represent conditions experienced under practical electrolyser conditions. Herein, a range of transition metal oxide (TMO) catalysts are evaluated and compared in a three-electrode cell and in an electrolyser. We show that the same catalyst significantly underperforms in a three-electrode cell. Hence, many OER catalysts in academic labs may have been erroneously omitted from further optimisation processes due to showing &apos;poor&apos; performance in conventional three-electrode cells. Herein, we wish to show this discrepancy experimentally and suggest a solution to scientists wanting to find active OER catalysts by using 3D-printing to inexpensively manufacture electrolyser devices for OER catalyst evaluation.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Oxygen evolution catalysts under proton exchange membrane conditions in a conventional three electrode cell vs. electrolyser device: a comparison study and a 3D-printed electrolyser for academic labs dagger

Popis výsledku anglicky

Developing active and stable oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalysts that can operate in electrolyser environments is of utmost important in order to produce H-2 gas for electricity generation. Currently in academia, many of these studies are carried out in conventional three-electrode cell set-ups; however, this configuration may not accurately represent conditions experienced under practical electrolyser conditions. Herein, a range of transition metal oxide (TMO) catalysts are evaluated and compared in a three-electrode cell and in an electrolyser. We show that the same catalyst significantly underperforms in a three-electrode cell. Hence, many OER catalysts in academic labs may have been erroneously omitted from further optimisation processes due to showing &apos;poor&apos; performance in conventional three-electrode cells. Herein, we wish to show this discrepancy experimentally and suggest a solution to scientists wanting to find active OER catalysts by using 3D-printing to inexpensively manufacture electrolyser devices for OER catalyst evaluation.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10405 - Electrochemistry (dry cells, batteries, fuel cells, corrosion metals, electrolysis)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

O - Projekt operacniho programu

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Materials Chemistry A

ISSN

2050-7488

e-ISSN

2050-7496

Svazek periodika

9

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

14

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

9113-9123

Kód UT WoS článku

000632140300001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85104041504