Open-air Museums – the Future of the Presentation of Spiritual and Architectural Heritage

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60461373%3A22310%2F22%3A43924610" target="_blank" >RIV/60461373:22310/22:43924610 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.muzeologia.sk/index_htm_files/mkd_1_22_rychnova.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.muzeologia.sk/index_htm_files/mkd_1_22_rychnova.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.46284/mkd.2022.10.1.1" target="_blank" >10.46284/mkd.2022.10.1.1</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Open-air Museums – the Future of the Presentation of Spiritual and Architectural Heritage

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The origins of “open-air museums” date back to the 19th century and from the very beginning were closely linked to efforts to capture, preserve and present folk culture. However, during the course of the 20th century, especially in its later part, the concept of open-air museums began to expand. Open-air museums were founded that focused on urban, industrial and military environments, ecological issues, or on charting the life of prehistoric and ancient cultures. Along with this, the methodological concept for this specific type of institution saw some development, and the interdisciplinary approaches expanded in response, covering a wide range of humanities as well as natural sciences. Besides the academic approach, a social and community overlap is also required from these institutions. This article poses the question of how the concept of open-air museums can continue to develop and what direction the role of presenting cultural heritage in an open landscape could take in the future. The arguments herein are based on the philosophical and spiritual dimension of man’s dwelling in the world and his relationship to the landscape in which he lives. We believe that the future of open-air museums should, wherever possible, focus on the preservation of monuments in their historical context and especially in their natural links in terms of landscape, urbanism and architecture. To ensure this concept remains sustainable, it is necessary that these monuments be involved in the life of villages and communities, ideally also on the basis of cooperation between academia and local entities, which are usually villages or municipalities and citizens’ initiatives. Examples of such a direction can be seen in the founding and running of Rochus Park in the Uherské Hradiště region and in the concept of the association of villages called Mariánská zahrada in the Jičín region, both in the Czech Republic.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Open-air Museums – the Future of the Presentation of Spiritual and Architectural Heritage

Popis výsledku anglicky

The origins of “open-air museums” date back to the 19th century and from the very beginning were closely linked to efforts to capture, preserve and present folk culture. However, during the course of the 20th century, especially in its later part, the concept of open-air museums began to expand. Open-air museums were founded that focused on urban, industrial and military environments, ecological issues, or on charting the life of prehistoric and ancient cultures. Along with this, the methodological concept for this specific type of institution saw some development, and the interdisciplinary approaches expanded in response, covering a wide range of humanities as well as natural sciences. Besides the academic approach, a social and community overlap is also required from these institutions. This article poses the question of how the concept of open-air museums can continue to develop and what direction the role of presenting cultural heritage in an open landscape could take in the future. The arguments herein are based on the philosophical and spiritual dimension of man’s dwelling in the world and his relationship to the landscape in which he lives. We believe that the future of open-air museums should, wherever possible, focus on the preservation of monuments in their historical context and especially in their natural links in terms of landscape, urbanism and architecture. To ensure this concept remains sustainable, it is necessary that these monuments be involved in the life of villages and communities, ideally also on the basis of cooperation between academia and local entities, which are usually villages or municipalities and citizens’ initiatives. Examples of such a direction can be seen in the founding and running of Rochus Park in the Uherské Hradiště region and in the concept of the association of villages called Mariánská zahrada in the Jičín region, both in the Czech Republic.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60404 - Folklore studies

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Muzeológia a Kultúrne Dedičstvo

ISSN

1339-2204

e-ISSN

2453-9759

Svazek periodika

10

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

SK - Slovenská republika

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

"5 – 18"

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85126795838