Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Life cycle assessment of variants of water treatment technological processes in Pilsen (Czech Republic)

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60461373%3A22320%2F25%3A43931536" target="_blank" >RIV/60461373:22320/25:43931536 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://iwaponline.com/wpt/article/20/4/954/107630/Life-cycle-assessment-of-variants-of-water" target="_blank" >https://iwaponline.com/wpt/article/20/4/954/107630/Life-cycle-assessment-of-variants-of-water</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2025.049" target="_blank" >10.2166/wpt.2025.049</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Life cycle assessment of variants of water treatment technological processes in Pilsen (Czech Republic)

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The purpose of a drinking water treatment plant (DWTP) is to produce water of adequate quality. However, used technology, chemicals, and energy generate increased environmental impacts. This study evaluates drinking water production in Pilsen City, identifies the arising impacts, and determines ways to reduce them by the life cycle assessment (LCA). The current technology is based on three stages of separation, including the following schemes: coagulation, sedimentation, pH adjustment, rapid sand filtration, ozonation, granular activated carbon filtration, disinfection, and stabilization. The results obtained using the EF 3.0 method revealed that consumption of electricity and aluminum sulfate coagulant had the largest impact in most categories. The results of the LCA showed that the reconstruction of the technology reduced overall environmental impacts by 19.3%. The treatment process with the dosing of the alternative coagulant was assessed using a model approach. A comparison of the results showed that DWTP using iron sulfate has lower environmental impacts. In the end, the impacts of the current DWTP with electricity from the electricity grid were evaluated and compared with alternative sources for electricity production. The environmental impact of DWTP could be reduced using a larger share of renewable sources for electricity production.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Life cycle assessment of variants of water treatment technological processes in Pilsen (Czech Republic)

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The purpose of a drinking water treatment plant (DWTP) is to produce water of adequate quality. However, used technology, chemicals, and energy generate increased environmental impacts. This study evaluates drinking water production in Pilsen City, identifies the arising impacts, and determines ways to reduce them by the life cycle assessment (LCA). The current technology is based on three stages of separation, including the following schemes: coagulation, sedimentation, pH adjustment, rapid sand filtration, ozonation, granular activated carbon filtration, disinfection, and stabilization. The results obtained using the EF 3.0 method revealed that consumption of electricity and aluminum sulfate coagulant had the largest impact in most categories. The results of the LCA showed that the reconstruction of the technology reduced overall environmental impacts by 19.3%. The treatment process with the dosing of the alternative coagulant was assessed using a model approach. A comparison of the results showed that DWTP using iron sulfate has lower environmental impacts. In the end, the impacts of the current DWTP with electricity from the electricity grid were evaluated and compared with alternative sources for electricity production. The environmental impact of DWTP could be reduced using a larger share of renewable sources for electricity production.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2025

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Water Practice and Technology

  • ISSN

    1751-231X

  • e-ISSN

    1751-231X

  • Svazek periodika

    20

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    4

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

  • Počet stran výsledku

    17

  • Strana od-do

    954-970

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001479526300010

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-105004873564