Operationalizing planetary boundaries through demand-side indicators

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60461373%3A22320%2F25%3A43932494" target="_blank" >RIV/60461373:22320/25:43932494 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.11.003" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.11.003</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.11.003" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.spc.2025.11.003</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Operationalizing planetary boundaries through demand-side indicators

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Planetary boundaries delimit the safe operating space for humanity to ensure the stability and functioning of the Earth system. Demand-side indicators can help navigate specific pathways and solutions to stay within the boundaries. In recent years, an increasing quantity of scientific work is connecting planetary boundary framing to demand-side analysis, yet there is often a lack of consistency in this research. Here we review relevant literature (including life-cycle assessments and environmental footprint analysis), focusing on the choice and suitability of indicators and methods used. We find a persistent gap between the idealist focus on impacts on earth systems functioning and the actual indicators used. We evaluate the available options, outline current research gaps, and extract lessons on how to better account for Earth system impacts from the demand-side perspective.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Operationalizing planetary boundaries through demand-side indicators

Popis výsledku anglicky

Planetary boundaries delimit the safe operating space for humanity to ensure the stability and functioning of the Earth system. Demand-side indicators can help navigate specific pathways and solutions to stay within the boundaries. In recent years, an increasing quantity of scientific work is connecting planetary boundary framing to demand-side analysis, yet there is often a lack of consistency in this research. Here we review relevant literature (including life-cycle assessments and environmental footprint analysis), focusing on the choice and suitability of indicators and methods used. We find a persistent gap between the idealist focus on impacts on earth systems functioning and the actual indicators used. We evaluate the available options, outline current research gaps, and extract lessons on how to better account for Earth system impacts from the demand-side perspective.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Sustainable Production and Consumption

ISSN

2352-5509

e-ISSN

2352-5509

Svazek periodika

61

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

Neuveden

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

"181 "- 193

Kód UT WoS článku

001619316900001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105021131571